Those who can make you believe absurdities, will make you commit atrocitie —Voltaire

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Egocentric & Elitist Response By Gary Null To Gallo's Egg

Egocentric & Elitist Response By Gary Null To Gallo's Egg

The egocentric, dismissive and out of touch response from Gary Null to Gallo's Egg highlights what many have been saying for years now. AIDS dissent is ruled by an elitist circle of mainly doctors and their acolytes, who when it comes to the crunch and at times such as these, can make it difficult to distinguish even which side they are really on.

What difference is there in this response from Gary Null and one coming from Nick Bennett or JP Moore, who always try to convince us that we don't know enough about this garbage called "AIDS" science to challenge it? Where is the difference?

This is the clearest and most immediate example of how this elitism and browbeating works even within dissent ranks. It is a disgrace that Gary Null still thinks that we all need to spend years reading gobbledygook to be able to see, smell and decry a political fraud. It is also a clear example of what I too have many times lashed out against, which is that these elements within dissent will stop at nothing either to keep themselves and their tired and ineffective scientific dissertations centre stage.

They are above all, loathed to admit that when one follows this from the political angle one CAN and many DO come to clearer and more effective conclusions about the 'AIDS" brouhaha. What exactly has becoming an incomprehensible encyclopaedia of scientific fact, (which even though may be correct, is still a product of the perverse and corrupt "AIDS" science), achieved here to permit Gary Null to be so dismissive and condescending?

This element within dissent has the same effect on people that the flat declaration by 'AIDS" apologists has, when they say that none of us, Null included, know enough about "AIDS" to question it. This is unacceptable and I hope that it is answered vociferously by all. If Gary Null, like JP Moore believes that, then in my books, in spite of all his work, he is just another arrogant, egocentric, out of touch and elitist fool.

Thank God for Clark Baker, he is a breath of fresh air in this genocidal stench. he is the latest to show that this 'AIDS" scam is not that difficult to grasp after all. Maybe that is what pisses Gary Null off more than anything here, Clark took three months to work it out, and he is not the only one either, whilst after a quarter of a century of scientific haggling, dissent doctors have not even been able to come up with ONE SINGLE idea on which they ALL agree, unanimously and forcefully. Yet they still claim total authority and stay firmly centre stage.

This factor is a major problem within dissent, and NOT the length of time one has been vocal about it all, or the lack of scientific reading by those who actually take the political angle on "AIDS", because they are clever enough to see that the scientific road lead to mostly helping the "AIDS" orthodoxy maintain the confusion.

Dr. Gary Null needs to chill out and stop talking and thinking like Mark Weinberg. It ain't healthy, or very becoming for someone who claims to fight the orthodoxy. His comments sound more orthodox than those of the orthodoxy. They are certainly more objectionable and unacceptable coming from him.


David G. Collins, B.Msc. said...

Open letter to Gary Null about Clark Baker and Gallo's Egg

Mr. Gary Null,

With all due respect, there is enough room for everybody to speak up on this issue without meeting anyone's criteria of "knowing enough". You certainly have the right to decide who and what you promote on your website and/or radio show. But your cursory dismissal of Clark Barker and his investigation speaks volumes about you. Did you actually read the article or did you immediately judge it as unworthy of your attention?

I appreciate the work that you have done, Mr. Null. However, Clark Baker, being an former law enforcement officer, former Marine Core Sergeant and a current private investigator with an apparent solid reputation and history of standing for the Truth (often without financial compensation), has the resources to come at this from a very unique and fresh angle. Your videos, articles and books have enlightened me, angered me, depressed me, but never did they give me a feeling of hope as Mr. Baker's single article has done. He is not just spreading the truth, he is not just talking about it, HE IS REALLY DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

The fact that you would not promote his work or feel that I "have it in reverse" is highly disappointing as I have, up to this point, respected you for the work you've done. There is no room for EGO in this very serious matter and I did not realize that you felt that you had cornered the market on exposing the criminal activities of those defending the HIV=AIDS myth. How many lawsuits have you filed against any of these criminals? Or are you just out to promote and sell your own products? I find it very difficult to respect anyone that so obviously worships at the alter of the almighty dollar and robes their ego with an elitist attitude making themselves like some kind of an untouchable holy man. I now see you as someone who sees this issue as something to capitalize on for money and recognition.

After receiving your disappointing response, as someone whose life as been negatively impacted over the last 15+ years by being branded "HIV positive", I would have to support the work of Mr. Baker over yours, regardless of the length of experience. Mr. Baker is obviously out for the truth and not self aggrandizement as it appears you are. Elitism and over inflated ego's are destroying this planet. It is precisely because of Mr. Gallo's ego, surrounded by hungry greed, that so many lives have been destroyed over the last 25 years by the HIV myth. Everywhere you look you can see the destruction of society being precisely caused by sociopaths with over inflated egos and greed. It's a bigger problem than AIDS... It's killing millions of people everyday.

I will still reluctantly recommend that people watch your videos because there is so little out there, they disclose a lot of information and they can be seen for free. AND GETTING THE MESSAGE OUT THERE IS WHAT IS IMPORTANT and I will support anyone who is speaking the truth. However, I will also let everyone know, similar to most medical doctors, your ego overshadows much of what you do and not to expect you to do more than promote your own self interests and line your own pocketbook.

It's not about you Mr. Null and it's not even about Clark Baker.... It's about people like me whose lives have been negatively impacted by this criminal lie perpetuated by the medical industry, pharmaceutical companies, The FDA, insurance companies, greedy doctors and the government. And more importantly, it's about the lives of those thousands whose trust is being violated and are still being indoctrinated every single day into the HIV=AIDS religion and are then fed the sacrament of HAART only to be slowly poisoned to death to the great financial benefit of a relatively few dangerous sociopaths.

David G Collins

Dan said...

Great post, Manu.

But who's responsible for the "AIDS debate" for the most part being an intellectual-elitist pursuit?

I got caught up in it for a while. And after a couple of scathing emails from one of the "scientists" on "our side", I woke up. These people only call the shots if people like you and I allow them to.

Anyway, if "AIDS" was really about science, it would have been over before it started. It's political. It's sociological. But one thing it isn't is science (at least the science most people idealize and romanticize).

Dan said...

Speaking of idealized and romanticized science and scientists...

I was watching an episode of SG-1 yesterday. The storyline was about a bitter debate between the peoples of two continents (on another planet, of course).

The debate was about their origin. The people of one continent believed that they were brought to their planet by aliens via stargates. The people of the other continent believed in a God that created them (also had a Darwin-like theme to it as well).

A scientist was confronted with the evidence that his belief in the God version of events was completely wrong. He told one of the characters that he was just as excited to be proven wrong as he would have been to be proven correct. He was standing on the scientific ideal of discovery and obtaining knowledge, and that knowledge was essentially neutral.

After watching that, I thought, "yeah, right...if only *real* scientists actually had the ideals of this fictional character". I suppose such things need to remain in the realm of fiction.

Even the darling of the dissident scientists (Duesberg) wouldn't pass the test for the fictional character in SG-1. Duesberg, against logic and evidence, maintains that HIV exists. Even he doesn't feel the need to isolate "HIV" the old-fashioned way, stating that new methods are better than the old one (which puts him in league with the orthodoxy on the isolation issue).

It's too bad that real scientists can only be found in science fiction. Ironic.

Manu said...

Nice to hear you Dan. I could not agree more. I have believed that science is not the answer here and that the doctors no matter which side they are on, will always be doctors first and foremost. The intentions are of course different in both camps but they all deny the fact that this is not scientific, it is political.

They want to control the debate and control the damage from the debate. In the end they end up all making it easier for the AIDS Mafia to get its way. Some because they have a stake there, the others because they have a stake in proving that they are right.

Dan said...

the scientists on both sides have a stake in this, and it's not necessarily for the health and well-being of humanity.

It's too bad that ACTUPSF was little more than a group of angry malcontents looking for a cause through which to vent their anger. Well, this is the distinct impression I got after attending one of their meetings. I guess the most diplomatic thing I can say about them is they failed to realize their potential.

ACTUPSF took the issue to the streets and out of the oh-so-polite "science" arena. They graphically showed how AIDS promoters profitted from people's misery. They presented a picture closer to the truth, which is that "AIDS" is a very macabre and PROFITABLE business.

They occasionally went overboard (for sure). But one of the most truthful moments is when I saw David Pasquarelli literally throw "AIDS drugs" at a bunch of gay men in wheel chairs while yelling "die, faggots, die"! On the surface (for the true believers) it looked like one of the most callous and cruel things a person could do, but Pasquarelli was hitting the nail on the head, sociologically and psychologically-speaking.

Manu said...

That image you describe there of David Pasquarelli is one of supreme and sublime theatricality which is so full of truth it hurts.

And it should.