The Menace Of "HIV" Tests And The Braindead Popstars Who Promote Them

HIV 'FALSE POSITIVE' TEST STRESS

By Melissa Kline
June 22, 2008

Hundreds of people were incorrectly told they had tested positive for HIV at New York City STD clinics this winter.

Almost half the results given by the clinics were false positives, the Department of Health confirmed.

From November to April, 213 people tested positive after taking a rapid mouth-swab HIV test. A second test revealed they did not have the virus.

The city would not explain why, as false positives mounted, it continued to administer the tests.

Read the rest on Fox here or The NY Post here

*************

How do “Hiv tests” work? In sum, they don’t work at all. They come up as “false positives” in numbers far exceeding “true positives”:

“Sir, In the May 9 issue of The Lancet, Round the World correspondents discussed AIDS-associated problems in former Eastern bloc countries…I would like to emphasize another alarming concern – namely, the rapid growth in false-positive HIV tests in the former USSR, and in Russia especially. In 1990, of 20.2 million HIV tests done in Russia only 12 were confirmed and about 20,000 were false positives. 1991 saw some 30,000 false positives out of 29.4 million tests, with only 66 confirmations.” (The Lancet, June 1992)

They have no ability to determine if someone has or does not have the antibodies they think they’re looking for; the interpretation of “HIV positive” is subjective and not consistent...

Read the rest here

*************

Banalities in RED.
No comments necessary for those with brain.
We, just some...for the hell of it...

Kelly Rowland Takes HIV Test For Charity (??)

On Showbiz News (Well, of course...)
By WENN, June 21 2008

R+B singer KELLY ROWLAND will undergo a HIV and Aids test in Africa to raise awareness of the deadly diseases - in a bid to try and dissolve the stigma surrounding the illnesses.

-So they supposedly are not aware of that which according to the same sources, is supposedly decimating them? They need a washed-up American teeny-sex-kitten-pop star to tell them that?

The former Destiny's Child star decided to visit Nairobi to encourage the country's young people to get tested for the illness, which is rife in the Kenyan capital.

-Illness? Which one? The one produced by lack of clean water and malnutrition? Does she know that diarrhea is enough to get you the "AIDS" label in Africa? Do they actually use HIV tests in Africa to dish out 'AIDS" labels to people? If so, does she know which ones they use? Are they specific? Have they been validated?
Which one did she take?

Rowland is an ambassador for MTV's Staying Alive Foundation, which aims to reduce discrimination against HIV and Aids victims, and has visited projects in Tanzania and Kenya to promote the charity.

Oh, the promotion of another "AIDS" charity!! I thought so. The Staying Alive Foundation? How groovy!! Who founded this the Bee Gees?

I thought that it was weird o go promote "HIV testing" in Africa, when in Africa we all know that not tests are even necessary...so she went to promote her "AIDS Charity".

Does this one support the BAN on vitamin trials and only endorse toxic "black-box label" medication for Africans too?

She says, "Ignorance is not bliss when it comes to HIV infection, and it is important for everyone to know their HIV status.

-Yes, but ignorance IS bliss, when it comes to knowing WHAT IT IS YOU ARE ACTUALLY PROMOTING!!

"The quicker you know your status, the sooner you can receive treatment if you're HIV+, and reduce the risk of inadvertently infecting future partners."

-Status? Treatment? Infecting future partners?? Makes one wonder just where these "artists" get all this deadly knowledge and all this "authority" from to do and say "such" things!!

They go to Africa to add insult to injury, under the guise of "concern" to PROMOTE themselves and some "charity" whatever that means in this murky world of "AIDS" activism, and want us to actually think well of them for doing it.

Who are these idiots kidding? This girl should get an education, especially if as a singer she is already washed-up.

*****************

This One Takes The Trophy!!!

Free HIV tests, gasoline offered

Monday, June 23, 2008

Staff Report

Franklin Primary Health Center Inc. will offer free HIV/AIDS testing on National HIV Testing Day, which is Friday. Testing will begin at 9:30 a.m. at the Medical Mall at 1303 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue.

The first 50 people who come in, take a quiz and get the HIV test will receive a gift certificates for free gas at Griffith Shell, 1262 Government St. Wal-Mart gift cards and other prizes will also be awarded.

"The goal for this day," said Tyloria Crenshaw, HIV Coordinator at Franklin, "is to get people tested, so they will know their status, get into treatment and protect themselves and those they love."

South Alabama CARES will hold a candlelight vigil in Cathedral Square at 9 that evening, to remember those who have lost their lives in this pandemic. They will also conduct free HIV testing from 9 p.m. to midnight. For information, call Crenshaw at 436-7665.

Other agencies participating are the Mobile County Health Department, South Alabama CARES, the Mobile County HIV/AIDS Direct Care Consortia and the Mobile AIDS Coalition.

No words for this one...so I'll leave you with this post here.

Bobby Throws Wobbly On The Huffington (Puffington) Post

Bobby Throws Wobbly
On The Huffington (Puffington) Post

Full "re-doctored" piece:
Global Warming Denialism and beyond to HIV & AIDS
by Bob Ostertag
Also featured on Aidstruth.org

People are actually challenging the out of touch claims and the propaganda spun by those who seem to think that they have real authority on these subjects. So Bob gets angry.

Bob is an "artist", a musician and actor, at least that what the information available on the Internet says, still this does not stop him from writing with total authority on such issues, which would be fine I he were not doing it all under the banner of "anti-denialism". He is attacking and slandering those who question by calling them "denialists" and equating them with "holocaust denial". His use of this label is also affirming the fevered religious nature of his argument, as opposed to the scientific or simply the clear headed.

Must he incessantly cry "heresy" to make his point? It seems so...

After listing the questions people have raised in their posts in a dismissive manner, he takes the high moral ground, claims absolute authority and he retorts back with a tirade, which reads like the journalistic equivalent of a Bonnie Langford (Violet from the classic 60's kids show Just William) moment:

Answering some points:
Quotes in italics and some in colour for some unfathomable reason.
Replies are in bold.

Two days ago, I wrote about a recent survey that showed that Americans' concern over global climate change had decreased over the last 12 months, and urged the Obama campaign to make it a much bigger priority than it has. Though I did not anticipate this would be a controversial argument, as of now the post has over 300 comments. Even more surprising is the number of commenters who assert that global warming is either a myth or a conspiracy. To cite just a few: * "If you're lucky to live long enough, you'll see a lot of these "scares" come and go throughout your lifetime. This is just the latest. When the next one comes the chanting crowd will move over and attach itself to it." * "In a few more years Global Warming will be shown to be the scam and money making scheme that many already know it to be. I'm not going to argue degrees and post link after link showing the falsehoods." * "Green house gases are a myth. A volcano puts out more green house gases with one eruption than the US puts out in 3 years. Get a new cause - check your facts." * "All this hysteria about global warming is a ruse to allow governments to tax us more." * "Americans are finally coming out of the ether. Slowly we are realizing "man made" global warming is one of the greatest lies told to the world. More and more scientist are coming forward with the truth about the flawed science behind it. I'm, as I have been ALL my life, am proud of this country!! We are the best at thinking for ourselves." There are many more. And these are from readers of The Huffington Post, a group I would have thought would be among the best informed. However, Huffington Post readers are likely among those Americans who get most of their news from the Internet, and these responses highlight the complex impact of the Internet on public opinion.

-Your “opinion” is found on the Internet too. So, the same criteria would apply to you too I presume?

These commenter are for the most part not uninformed but rather misinformed.

-Your “opinion” again. Your statement of “opinion” is based on what "authority? How misinformed?

And what about vested interests? Don't they count? Many have vested interests in these causes, where huge sums of money are granted to practically anyone claiming to be an activist organisation fighting to save the world or lives. AIDS is a classic example of this, where you have many organisation who receive huge amounts of money from the Pharma industry. Just look at the sponsors for an AIDS conference, or any AIDS event. They always look more like a "Pharma" event more than an "AIDS" one.

No, I think we are rather well informed on many things that you do not seem to be.

They can cite a combination of research that was well-done but is out of date, research that was well-done but has been misinterpreted, research that was badly done, and weird conspiracy theories, all with the support of key conservative institutions and pundits.

-Here are two statements based on "reserch" posted over at Hank Barnes Blog. They are by two leading "AIDS" figures, none of whom are "denialists" though I admit I don't know if they are "conservatives":

"HIV is unquestionably transmitted through heterosexual intercourse. Indeed, heterosexual intercourse is now responsible for 70-80% of all HIV transmissions worldwide"
----Dr. Nancy Padian, UCSF, (2006)

"It is very unlikely there will be a heterosexual epidemic in other countries. Ten years ago a lot of people were saying there would be a generalised epidemic in Asia – China was the big worry with its huge population. That doesn't look likely. "
--Dr. Kevin De Cock, World Heath Organization, Dept. of HIV/AIDS (2008)

These statements come from two people who are in the same camp. The camp you say is the "right" one to believe and which you seem to be representing. Why don't you explain this, instead of calling names those who see this and logically think: Holy Sh*t!! Which one is it?

It is an important reminder that when we discuss how to mobilize our country on the issue of climate change, we must reckon not only with educating the uneducated and mobilizing the inactive, we must also reckon with a surprisingly large group of the active, vocal and miseducated.

-Political paranoia apart, with what “authority” do you present yourself as someone who has it "right" whilst all the rest who disagree have it “wrong”? For every study you present to make your case, there are 20 more that will demolish it. Are you a climatologist or a retrovirologist as well as an artist and journalist?

The whole stance of climate change denialists has uncanny parallels to that of AIDS denialists, who deny that HIV causes AIDS.

-Yes the most striking one being the use of the word “denialist” by both groups who defend the baloney, to equate any questioning and skepticism with ”holocaust denial". That is the most glaring example of that parallel.

The causative role of HIV in the development of AIDS has been established and is the subject of scientific consensus.

-Now who is out of touch? Wrong! There was never, nor is there now a scientific consensus on "HIV" causing "AIDS", whatever those terms mean.

See here on HIV & AIDS
See here for Global warming as well, since you seem to be such an expert on both these issues.

The false scientific consensus on "aids" was shattered last week when Kevin De Cock of the who said Heterosexual AIDS was OVER was over. With that, the phony “consensus” you talk of was shattered on all fronts, scientifically, politically and journalistically as well.

Denialist arguments are considered to be the result of cherry-picking and misrepresentation of predominantly outdated scientific data, with the potential to endanger public health by dissuading people from utilizing proven treatments.

-“Considered” by whom? I will deal with the idea of “endangerment” later...

With the rejection of these arguments by the scientific community, AIDS denialist material is currently spread largely through the Internet. (Wikipedia)

-it is everywhere not just on Wikipedia. There are books and documentaries too. There is 25 years of material on this topic, on which you claim there has been a “consensus”.

This is a group with whom I have had extensive experience, as they have had a very public activist presence here in my home town of San Francisco. As with climate change denialists, AIDS denialists piece together their arguments from misinterpretations of valid scientific papers, from the comments of respected scientists venturing out of their specialty and writing in non-peer reviewed journals, and the political support of conservative institutions. And again, as with climate change denialism, the whole package gets its momentum and false air of rigor from being endlessly circulated on the Internet.

-The mainstream media censors any open questioning, so the internet is where one can find all arguments, both sides of the coin are there. So, maybe it is through the internet that one can get a clear picture of the truth here. To suggest that you are the only one offering it is ridiculous.

Are aidstruth not on the internet too? And you. Where do you think we read you? You use the medium, but also criticize it on the grounds that it does not give you and your chums from the "email aidstruth group" sole clout.

Here on the internet you have to actually debate, as opposed to just dictate, as you do on the msm. That is really why you are so furious with the internet. You try and invalidate it because it does not just give you and yours alone the space to dictate, but puts you out there, so people can answer you and question you. Why are you so scared of that?

What is most remarkable about AIDS denialism is how it has persevered through 25 years of the epidemic. In the early days of the AIDS epidemic, many of the arguments were not so far-fetched. But in 1996-1997, the course of the epidemic changed with the introduction of highly effective medications. People who started taking the medications stopped dying.

-There's a good bit of Orwellian “doublethink/newspeak".

People did not stop dying when the new "lifesaving" but "toxic black-box label" drug cocktail was invented.

People stopped dying when mono-therapy AZT was not given anymore to all and sundry who tested "positive" with that highly questionable, totally non-specific-non-validated, so called "HIV" test, which detects nothing specific to "HIV" and everything else besides.

Azt was given to people at three times the dose it had been shown and known to kill anything or anyone that took it. We all saw our friends die from that. Healthy men who came home with a "diagnosis" and a bag of AZT pills, who took them and shrivelled up and died right in front of our incredulous eyes.

That is why people stopped dying.

One would have thought that would have ended the debate. Incredibly, it did not. In fact, many denialists clung to their misunderstandings right through their own deaths – deaths that in many cases could have been avoided had the deceased taken HIV medications that were readily available to them. Ken Anderlini was a co-moderator of the "AIDS Myth Exposed" message board on MSN. Anderlini died in April of 2007. A fellow denialist wrote a death announcement saying: "Over the past couple of years his health had declined rapidly with a strange neurological disease for which nobody could pinpoint the cause (except doctors who claimed it was HIV related, of course)." Another denialist activist, Michael Bellafontaine died on May 10, 2007. His obituary reported that "According to Andrea Lindsay, a friend and fellow activist, Mr. Bellefountaine died of a sudden systemic infection, though the exact cause has not been determined." (AIDSTruth.org has a web page that tracks the deaths of AIDS denialists.)

-Aidstruth.org? The “leaderless-email group of “doctors” and "hobbyists” according to Nick Bennett, one of its leading members? That Aidstruth?


Aidstruth whose list of members dwindles by the day? That aidstruth? Where JP Moore and others have just recently all vanished from the members list, because they could not dedicate all their life and time to aids? (according to Nick Bennett again), but that does not seem to stop them or you from claiming total authority on the subject.

Links to the full exchange are here & here

Well, forgive us for not putting our lives in their hands, but somehow, I for one just don't trust them.

Some leading sceptics have been doing just that, dedicating all their time and effort to look into this issue, how have these people less authority and credibility than the aidstruth gang? On what grounds? How?

How are these people at Aidstruth.org an authority on aids? How are our lives best served by the “opinions” of a group of chums who email each other, according to you? How?

How about that for public endangerment?

The spectacle of AIDS denialists clinging to their views right through their own illnesses and up to their very deaths does not bode well for the future of debate on global climate change.

-Right now the true spectacle is the one offered by people like Aidstruth.org and yourself, who seem to think that throwing wobblies slandering, taking the high moral ground, claiming authority, consensus, superiority, ignoring facts, denigrating the dead, claiming you know what they really died of…

Now that is one hell of a spectacle. Yes!

Many of us have been asking ourselves at what point the effects of climate change will be so obvious that debate over the basic facts of the matter will finally cease. The course of AIDS denialism suggests that the answer to the question might be never.

-There you are right. Never!

And just for the record, the Brits don’t buy the "Global Warming" baloney either: read here

And here is another good piece by The Guardian you may wish to read.
"The exploitation of AIDS".

He seems to be talking about the people you say are to be trusted. Oh those traitors the Brits, they have gone all "denialist too.

You should take note that right now, not even the World Health Organisation has the moral right to claim that kind of authority, because it has just publicly admitted that it lied, so for you to claim it yourself or in the name of your chums at Aidstruth.org, is not only foolish but the hight of bad taste and ignorance too.

To keep using the term "denialists" against people who question is an obvious dirty tactic reminiscent of the worse excesses of the hysterically deluded clergy rallying support to slaughter in the name of the "holy" inquisition. It is grotesque.

People have every right to question because they actually pay money, tax contributions that goes into these "unproven" and at times, insultingly outlandish theories. Everyone pays, sceptics are not exempt, so on those grounds alone, your tone and choice of words describing them as "denialists" are totally out of order. So if you want to be taken seriously you should consider dropping the Bernardo Gui attitude.

You should also stop protesting because people are refusing to listen to you and your chums from Aidstruth.org, after all, neither you nor they have any real "authority" here, all you are entitled to is an "opinion". Stop calling people names just because they are refusing to believe your opinion anymore and are asking questions.

After all if people are more skeptical and outright vocal at this moment, it must be because there are some pretty horrendous facts coming to light, that frankly, smell bad, very bad, and it ain’t the corpses either, but that “old smell of mendacity” that has pervaded the air to such an extent, that it has made it quite unbreathable.

The End Of AIDS-Bush Bestows Presidential Medal of Freedom On Fauci

The End Of AIDS
The USA Government Bestows "Divinity" On Its Top "AIDS" Man

Dr. Anthony S. Fauci: An adviser to the government on global AIDS issues, he is the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Bush said that Fauci still quotes what he learned from Jesuit teaching _ "Precision of thought. Economy of expression." And the president quipped, "And now you know why he never ran for public office."
Washington Post article

There would be those today who will recoil in horror at the news that Anthony Fauci has just received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from the President of the United States.

Not me.

This is great news. This heralds what many of us have been predicting for a while now, that the top brass in AIDS machine are pulling out. This announces the American Government’s planned and strategic abandoning of the AIDS stage. How?

By the political “Beatification” of Fauci, who represents the American Government. I presume the same thing will follow with Gallo too, maybe they have already done it and I missed it. If they are guilty, then so is the government. If they are saints, then the government is too. Simple. Much like Dominic de Guzmán for the Roman Catholic Church, same principle applies here: if Dominic de Guzmán is a saint, then the Inquisition and the Albigensian genocide is “holy” too.

Ain’t that clever?

Of course all those who still want to believe that this is not over, will protest that I see this wrong. There will be those on both sides of this argument who still maintain that this is not over yet. The activists, who for all intents a purposes are now left alone holding the bag, will claim “Vittoria” whilst some quarters of dissent, who cannot accept that we are not the ones bringing down the parts that are falling, but it is the AIDS machine that is self destructing, will say: "there, you see?".

Of course pressure has helped, as has the tenacity and courage of many who have risked all to expose the AIDS lie, culminating in a ceremony in Washington last month where Dr. Peter Duesberg and Celia Farber were honoured by Semmelweiss Society for their work. However, now the destruction of the “paradigm from hell” is being done by the "powers that be" themselves. They have had this planned for a while now. It has been more than obvious to those that wanted to see it.

AIDS has run its course. Power is pulling out. The activists, personalities like Tutu in South Africa, the brain-dead pop stars and film stars; who would all have to actually sing, act AND sell if they did not have AIDS, are now alone, and of course big pharma is still there too. But The WHO is out and so is the government.

AIDS Babylon. Are you confused?

Well, who wouldn't be? The confusion is on purpose though. After a series of atomic revelations over the last year that have left the devotees reeling and the skeptics trilling, finally last week the WHO’s stunning admission last week that heterosexual AIDS was OVER; what a word: OVER. De Cock used that himself. A day later Brendan O’Neill also letting rip in The Guardian, it was our friend Dan who noticed that all the language in the press was referring to "AIDS" in past tense; like AIDS “was”, “was not”… the press is full of it.

You check the list of backtracking over the lat year all detailed on Dan's blog, from the reduced figures for African and Indian "AIDS", the failure of the "AIDS vaccine, to the call for UNAIDS to be disbanded, the De Cock WHO statement, Peter Piot head of UNAIDS resigns. Add to that the fact that AIDSTruth members like JP Moore and Mark Wainberg have disappeared, Nick Bennett has declared AIDSTruth an email club for "AIDS" hobbyists, who now seem to be diversifying into the "Global Warming" field of activism. Aetiology has become a weather blog and Tara blogsphere's favourite weather girl.

So, in view of this royal mess, within that context, a ceremony of pomp to celebrate a political beatification is not only logical, but obligatory. It is an act to save face.

It is also worth remembering back the last World AIDS Day, when we were all so horrified to see that show. It looked like the AIDS machine was in optimum form. Enter Aurdy Serrano!!! Then look what came six months later!! So after all these cataclysmic events we have just lived through, it is time for another show, that works on various levels all at once. Just like the one put on, on World AIDS Day. It helps create confusion whilst the powers that be manoeuvre.

They are pulling out. Bring on the "Divine"!

Fauci has been hurled into the sky like Ariadne to become a constellation by the mighty hand of Zeus, himself here transformed into the earthly form of a Bush for the illustrious occasion. A little show of false divinity, still the best PR exercise governments have to confuse the issue so they can wriggle out of responsibilities and hide their guilt.

The AIDS Razzle-Dazzle
Give 'em the old razzle dazzle
Razzle Dazzle 'em
Back since the days of old Methuselah
Everyone loves the big bambooz-a-ler
Give 'em the old three ring circus
Stun and stagger 'em
When you're in trouble, go into your dance.
Though you are stiffer than a girder
They let you get away with murder
Razzle dazzle 'em
Razzle dazzle 'em
Razzle dazzle 'em
And they'll make you a star!

AidsTruth According To "Doctor" Nick Bennett

"Half the harm that is done in the world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t want to do harm—but the harm does not interest them . . . or they do not see it . . . because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves."
T.S. Eliot

After questioning Nick Bennett of AidsTruth over several days, (Links to the full exchange are here & here) we've discovered the following:

• Nick Bennett is not an Aids specialist. He does not see, diagnose or treat people given the phony Aids diagnosis. He does not work in the field.

Nevertheless, he gives advice, counsel, guidance on this very subject, as well as libel, insult and presents an authoritative, un-debatable decree on his website, claiming to be an expert in the field, a "double doc."

This constitutes fraud.

• He is a resident (in training) at a hospital in upstate New York. He claims and is willing to give some evidence that he work in Pediatrics. Again, he doesn't research Aids or work in the field. He is a hobbyist.

• He does no independent research of any kind into the topics, stories, events and people he attacks, libels and denigrates. He does not seek to confirm any story that troubles his belief in the Aids paradigm. He dismisses any evidence, story, event, statement, or piece of information that contradicts his belief as a "lie."

• He refuses any invitation to open, moderated public debate.

• He doesn't seem to care, even a little, when people are sickened, harmed, or killed by Aids drugs. He does not seem to care, even a little, when children are used in experiments with drugs that cause permanent disability and death.
  

• He states that any children who are sickened or killed by toxic Black Box labeled drugs, were as good as dead anyway, because he has assigned them the highly questionable and phony "Aids" label.

This is a position that allows him to justify murder.

• He is a member of a group of people, "Aidstruth," devoted to libeling, slandering, and causing economic harm to any researcher, doctor, scientist or individual in any field, who dares to differ publicly with the phony Aids paradigm.
  

• He claims to have been invited into this group by "no one," and that it is an "email club" for the most part, which posts its claims against its targets with un-debatable and unquestionable authority. Those who beg or dare to differ are called "denialists" as in "holocaust denialists."

• He therefore asks us to believe that the BBC, and other news organizations, and the South African courts would just capitulate to the pressure of an "informal, leaderless email group."

In practice, Aidstruth is a political action committee, not concerned with science, the scientific process, ethics, humanitarian needs, human rights, civil rights, or international law. It acts like the street arm of a larger mafia, for whom it does the dirty work.

We cannot determine the following from his responses:

• Where does Aidstruth get its funding?
• What is its relationship with the South African TAC (whose membership includes Aidstruth member Nathan Geffen)?
• Who does Aidstruth represent?

He is committing libel and fraud. He has no right to hold the positions he does nor has he any real authoritative power. They are his opinions. They are not "truths." Bennett should own them as such, or risk lawsuit. He is guilty of what he and Aidstruth accuse all those who question the phony Aids paradigm of doing:

He is endangering lives by taking advantage of the public's willingness to believe those who claim medical authority.

Mark Wainberg, another "vanished" AidsTruth member called for legislation, in that now infamous diatribe that can be seen in Robin Scovill's film The Other Side Of AIDS. I agree that we should be protected against such endangerment. If this is not a glaring example of that, then I don't know what is. I say though that it is not Duesberg or Farber that should be in jail. It is them.

Wainberg Diatribe 1

Wainberg Diatribe 2



Two more sites that do this sort of thing:
Aetiology
Denialism

"Here's the scandal, Dr. De Cock, and all you other would-be World-Manipulators: if you tell a lie to manipulate people to your own ends, and your lie causes people to die who would have lived, then you are to blame for their deaths. If you tell the truth and people die anyway, that is a tragedy, but at least you are not morally responsible for it. You are at least not a murderer.

If you feed false information into the public debate on an issue, you will in the long run bias the mechanism of debate in the direction of wrong results. Garbage in, garbage out. You may think you know how the mechanism works, so that you can manipulate it like a mere tool, but you can't. The mechanism is a truth-discovery device, and to manipulate it as if you already know the truth is a fundamental mistake. If you really care about justice and humanity, you should take the most scrupulous pains to be truthful."
From John Stuart Mill by a blogger

Press Release-Semmelweis Society International

OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
SEMMELWEIS SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL
80 12th STREET, SUITE #307
WHEELING, WEST VIRGINIA 26003
www.semmelweis.org
724-678-2648
“Supporting Fair and Proper Due Process in Medical Peer Review without Compromising
Medical Ethics or Patient Care”

********

"Semmelweis Society International does not present the Clean Hands Award lightly. In Dr. Duesberg's case, it is hard to imagine anyone more deserving than Professor Peter Duesberg and investigative reporter Celia Farber.

These two have withstood a vicious and ongoing multiyear multicontinent personal onslaught against their livelihoods, their character, and their families that is unparalleled since the Spanish Inquisition."

Their sole "crime" is to ask if there has not been a colossal error in our thinking to date.

The simple facts are that nobody has ever been cured of AIDS. No Vaccine has ever been developed. Something is wrong here.

Dr. Duesberg has an idea, a contrarian idea; to be sure, it is an idea, nothing more, but nothing less.

Celia Farber's "crime" is to have reported this contrarian idea, into a First Amendment Free Speech Protected Society, or so we all thought.

We pray that our elected officials will not succumb to the hostility and pressures that the AIDS/Pharma industry will use to discredit and further silence this most vital debate.

We at Semmelweis are proud of our decision to present Dr. Peter Duesberg and Celia Farber with our highest honor and wish them both all the best as they continue to find concrete answers to this elusive and misunderstood disease.

Sincerely,

Roland F. Chalifoux Jr., DO
President, Semmelweis Society International

June 1, 2008

Read the rest here

Nick Bennett-"No, we're not going to debate."

Who Is "Doctor" Nick Bennett??
Is he really a "Doctor"??

Who is this Nick Bennett who left that post on my blog here?
Is he this Nick Bennett who appears in the list at AIDSTruth, where JP Moore has, as if by art of magic (the "black" kind we hope) vanished from?

Is that the same Nick Bennett for whom Liam left a series of questions in a post here, in response hoping he would answer them?

Is this the Nick Bennett who after throwing what seems to me like the equivalent of a pungent little "fartette" on my blogspace, than ran back to his hole to hide and to scribble:

"No, we're not going to debate." here

Now wasn't that a really really sissy thing to do?

How rude you are Nicky. Now that's not the kind of maneuver one would expect from someone who lists Martial Arts, Zen, Computing, Music, Dungeons and Dragons, Rabbits as his interests, someone with such depth in his choice of literature, and music that quite leaves one breathless.

He also adds:

"It should have stopped 20 years ago."

Is this "Doctor" even aware that now even the World Health Organisation seems to disagree with that statement?

If you did not come here to debate, then why come?
Do you have some sort of secret uncontrollable crush on Liam?

So, where is JayPee Nicky?
Where he gone to?
You can at least tell us that. We miss him so...

*********

Questions for "Doctor" Nick:

"Doc", You're part of Aidstruth.

A) Where have John P. Moore, Mark Wainburg and Richard Jeffries gone?

They were all on the board of Aidstruth, and now they have fled. Their names are gone from your list of members. Where are they? Why have the abandoned the Aidstruth site?

You're on the Aidstruth board with Nathan Geffen. Geffen has just worked to ban the use of micronutrient studies in South Africa.

B) Are you in favor of banning micronutrient studies in South Africa?

C) Are there any micronutrient studies that improve the health of people given the clinical, subjective and non-standardized faux-diagnosis of "Aids?"

D) Are you at risk for "Hiv" according to the WHO's new and improved risk groups? (Are you a MSM, African or intravenous drug user)?

If not, what is the probability that a reactive "hiv test" represent a "true positive" when you take it and have a "reactive" test?

(Let's say that you've been milking cows lately, or petting a dog, and so you've developed antibodies that react with the false and artificial , non-specific test. Cow, dog, mouse, goat and human proteins all make the tests come up reactive, as we all know).

What is the probability, then, that you're a "true positive?" Or a "false negative?"

E) Please calculate the PPV, according to CDC guidelines.

So, "Doctor" Nick,
we invite you to answer our questions!
On my blog (unlike yours) you can post freely!!
Do pop in!

Where Is Johnny Where Is Marky?

John P Moore, Mark Wainberg & AIDSTruth

Comment on previous post by LS:
John P. Moore has left the building. He pulled his name from their roster within the last couple months, and Wainberg is gone too:

See here

"The AIDS Truth team members are" (in alphabetical order):

* Dr. Nicholas Bennett, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital, Syracuse, New York
* Dr. Jeanne Bergman, The Center for HIV Law and Policy in New York City
* Martin Delaney, Founding director of Project Inform
* Dr. Brian Foley, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico
* Nathan Geffen, Treatment Action Campaign, Cape Town, South Africa
* Gregg Gonsalves, AIDS and Rights Alliance for Southern Africa
* Eduard Grebe, AIDS and Society Research Unit, University of Cape Town, South Africa
* Dr. Bette Korber, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico
* Dr. Nicoli Nattrass, Director of the AIDS and Society Research Unit, University of Cape Town, South Africa
* Ken Witwer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

The team would like to thank Bob Funkhouser for a substantial amount of work on this website over the last few years."

What's Johnny "Moore drugs is Money for Me" doing? Is he hiding ahead of the curve, ahead of the crashing wave?

Where's Johnny gone to?

Official-Aetiology Is Now A Weather Blog-Tara Smith Announces That She MAY Not Write on AIDS Anymore

Aetiology is now officially a weather blog

Professor Tara Smith, of Aetiology blog fame, one of the staunchest supporters of the AIDS paradigm refuses to come clean, or to even come out, and above all refuses to permit any debate or mention of the momentous events that have taken place this week in the world of "AIDS". She has limited herself to reducing all posts on the matter to something that I believe would resemble the Torah, which if i am not mistaken is written without vowels.


Possibly her last and most cryptic post on AIDS


To all the trolls, when/if I write about HIV/AIDS again, I might consider allowing some of your repetitive comments to stay. For now, you're off-topic and incredibly rude.

Posted by: Tara C. Smith | June 14, 2008 12:26 PM

Full view here

Well there we have it! She is not really into AIDS anymore. Now Professor Tara Smith is a new microbe searching weather girl!
She says she's busy looking for microbes under water in Iowa, she is totally convinced that one will leap out like Godzilla and swallow us all up, so she wants to be ready waiting for it.


Has she lost her marbles, or is it just her nerve? This pretty little thing has now retreated into the mantal safe heaven, a sort of parallel reality, reinvented herself as blogsphere's favourite weather girl, only finding the time to call all who disagree with (whatever the f*ck her position is), a "denialist trolls", but constantly refuses to debate them, hear them, print them on her blog, and now actively CENSORS them by altering their words.


Now, after all that we are left with that when/if...

There's another one who jumped ship!!!

--------------------------------

Note: We understand that the flooding in Iowa is serious and constitutes an act of nature and God. We extend our sympathies and hope that Tara and all Iowans survive intact and in good stead. We will hold further questions until it is clear that the situation in her State has returned to normal, and all are safe. We wish Tara and all Iowans the best outcome and good fortune in dealing with the onslaught of nature.

The BBC & The Defiant Macabre Side Of AIDS: African Court Rules Vitamins Kill But Toxic "Black-Box" Medication Is Good For Africans

African Court Rules:

No Vitamins For Africans.
Vitamins Kill!
"Black Box" Label Medication Is Good For You!

AZT

BBC article

The BBC and its reporting of "AIDS"

The BBC, having ignored the latest admissions of LIES by the World Health Organisation's AIDS machine, the BBC either seems to be oblivious of the fact that the AIDS machine is under question right now, for 25 years of lies, after Kevin De Cock's admission that WHO had LIED about heterosexual AIDS ever having been a real threat published by The Independent.

Now the BBC joins forces with Gand inquisitor of the AIDS Religion JP Moore of AIDSTruthiness.org


They report on this news implying it is some sort of "victory" for common sense prevailing on "AIDS" in Africa. The last piece of EXTREMELY IMPORTANT news on "AIDS" before this one for the BBC, was that Madonna and Sharon (Karma) Stone were in Cannes playing AIDS whores. This news for the BBC was far more important that the WHO admission of LIES that heterosexual AIDS never even was!

In fact, when one runs over all the reporting on AIDS the BBC has run in the last year alone, it is not difficult to see that AIDS reporting is strictly limited to scaremongering, AIDS banalities and AIDS machine propaganda. The BBC always seems there to help out AIDSTruth when they are in a tight spot, such as they were with Liam Scheff's The Guinea Pig Kids documentary controversy, when they apologised for supposed "errors" in the documentary, probably after JP Moore sent them one of those emails he likes to send about this being a war and how he is going to crush everyone who stands in his way.

Now after TOTALLY IGNORING the latest monumental pieces of REAL NEWS on AIDS, the BBC comes back with a piece like this one today, just like AIDSTruth have, after a deathly silence these last few days. They report this as if it were something other than nonsensical, and to people this is totally nonsensical, hideous even, especially in the light of the latest revelation and lies. We are supposed to sigh in relief that an African judge has declared that Vitamins kill but AZT doesn't. AZT is good. Good God!!

It is alarming how much the BBC seems to be ignorant of the fact, that right now, when one filters this news through the general aura of SLEAZE that has been admitted officially these last few days, not just by De Cock but others as well such as in The Guardian article from last week, people actually see this for what it is: TERRIBLE, CRUEL and NONSENSICAL!!
Not surprising considering we all take fistfuls of them every morning.

The BBC is not some blogger. The BBC has duties that go beyond those a blogger has.

• How does the BBC justify the one sided reporting on a controversy, a scandal such as AIDS is finally turning out to be, by ignoring the important news and reporting only half the news? The half JPMoore likes?
• Is the BBC not aware that the public can see that they are picking and choosing what to report on AIDS instead of reporting everything and letting the public make informed decisions on what to believe?
• Does the BBC think that the public is stupid?
• Does the BBC not think it immoral that all they print on AIDS, is AIDS machine propaganda, instead of serious thought provoking information and ALL the facts?
• Does the BBC not see what we all see how this latest piece of news looks when you put it into the greater context of all that has happened this last week?
  
• Is the BBC trying to mislead the public?

Also:

• WHAT INTEREST DOES THE BBC HAVE IN WORKING WITH THIS MAN WHO THREATENS THOSE WHO DISAGREE WITH HIM WITH SQUASHING THEM?
• HOW IS THIS SERVING THE BRITISH PUBLIC?
• HOW IS THIS SERVING THE WORLD?
• HOW IS THIS SERVING THE REPUTATION OF THE BBC AS AN INSTITUTION?
• WHERE IS THE ARTICLE ABOUT THE TERRIBLE ADMISSIONS THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION HAS MADE THAT HETEROSEXUAL AIDS WAS A BIG POLITICALLY CONSTRUCTED LIE? THAT IS THE BIG NEWS RIGHT NOW.
• DOES THE BBC NOT SEE THAT IT IS TAKING THINGS OUT OF A GREATER CONTEXT TO HELP ONE SIDE OF THE AIDS DEBATE CONTINUE WITH THEIR WORK EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN DISCREDITED?
• DOES THE BBC NOT THINK IT HAS A DUTY TO MAKE SURE IT IS FAIR AND HONEST IN ITS REPORTING OF THIS TERRIBLE MESS, AND ACKNOWLEDGE THE FACT THAT A HUGE QUESTION MARKS IS NOW ON THE INTEGRITY OF MANY PERSONS WHO HAD THE PUBLICS TRUST SUCH AS ALL THOSE WHO SIGNED THE DURBAN DECLARATION?
  
• DOES THE BBC NOT THINK IT GRAVE THAT THAT TRUST HAS BEEN BROKEN?
• DOES THE BBC NOT THINK IT GRAVE THAT IT KEEPS SILENT ON THAT FACT?
• IS THERE NOTHING BETTER THE BBC CAN DO WITH BRITISH TAXPAYERS MONEY THAN SUPPORT AIDS PROPAGANDA INSTEAD OF REPORTING ALL THE NEWS?
• IS THE BBC NOT WORRIED THAT IT HAS NO CREDIBILITY ANYMORE ON AIDS REPORTING AS IT IS OBVIOUS TO ALL THAT IT IS NOT DOING ITS DUTY?

• WHO THE HELL IS THE BBC KIDDING?
• WHAT KIND OF OBVIOUS SUPERFICIAL ONE SIDED MISLEADING AIDS REPORTING IS THIS?

WHAT A SHAM!

THE BBC REPORTING ON AIDS IS TOTALLY OUT OF STEP. THEY IGNORE THE MOST IMPORTANT NEWS ON THE AIDS MESS UNFOLDING RIGHT NOW AND SEEM ONLY ABLE TO REPORT THE OBSOLETE STAR STUDDED AIDS BANALITIES OR JUDICIAL ONES LIKE THIS ONE, THAT TELL AFRICA AND THE WORLD TO SHUT UP AND:

COZ WE KNOW BEST!

WHAT AN INSULT!!!

THIS NEWS IS GROTESQUE!!!

Now quick, bring on Annie Lennox.
Sing sister sing!!!
Before we all die from the stench of horse manure and Vitamin C

AIDS Fallout- De Cock De Lay De Spin

De Cock De Lay De Spin

As if "De Cock" was not bad enough, we now have "De Lay" as well.

No, this is not a post about Charles Dickens's "The Old Curiosity Shop" , even though these names sound just as funny. Nor is it a piece about "Bleak House", even if that name would be most apt for the drama taking place in the "House Of AIDS" today.

These are the guys who are at the helm of the AIDS mess, which is falling apart right in front of our very eyes right now. Well actually De Cock has jumped De Ship and De Lay is De Livid and together they are attempting De Spin.

Confused? Well aren't we all...

Read all about it @ You Bet Your Life

************

A Serious Viewpoint: Various & Sundry

The Public's Trust In The AIDS Establishment Is Irrevocably Broken

AIDS Fallout-Liam Scheff At GNN - The Guardian: The exploitation of Aids - HIV Debate NOT Closed: The Times Of India

AIDS Fallout Latest:
After the WHO's declaration on AIDS,
the left-wing jumps ship too...

The Guardian
The Exploitation Of AIDS

The relentless politicisation and moralisation of Aids has not only distorted public understanding of the disease and generated unnecessary fear and angst – it has also potentially cost lives. James Chin estimates that UNAIDS wastes around $1bn a year in activities such as "raising awareness" about Aids and preventing the emergence of the disease in communities that are at little risk. How many lives could that kind of money save, if it were used to develop drugs and deliver them to infected or at-risk communities? It is time people treated Aids as a normal disease, rather than as an opportunity for spreading their own moral agendas.

Read it all here

********************************

Read the article by Liam Scheff at GNN

It is official: AIDS is not explicable by sexual transmission, at least not outside of Sub-Saharan Africans, gay men, intravenous drug users and prostitutes. For the rest of us, there is no heterosexual AIDS pandemic, and further, there will be no heterosexual AIDS pandemic.

There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

***************************

HIV Debate NOT Closed
Mayank Tiwari, Daily News and Analysis (India), 9 June 2008
Tope Health Official on The Times Of India
Details on You Bet Your Life

***********************

AIDS Titanic Sinks Even More- Top Brass Jumping Ship-AIDS Scam Nears End

AIDS IS OVER
(except for gays & blacks)

Hot on the heels of the STUNNING admission by WHO that:
Heterosexual AIDS never existed, published in The Independant.

Now we have this as well from The Wall Street Journal.
Retrovirus

Oh, and this one too from The Times Money Online
Mbeki Was Right-Inconvenient Truth?

& This latest piece today:

Head of UN's AIDS program Piot to step down
UNITED NATIONS, June 10 (Reuters) - The United Nations' top official in the global fight against AIDS, Peter Piot, is stepping down after 13 years, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said on Tuesday. Ban, in a speech before the 2008 High Level Meeting on HIV/AIDS, praised Piot for being a "tireless leader who has been at the vanguard of the response to AIDS since the earliest days of the epidemic."
Rest here

In fact, if you just Google: "heterosexual AIDS is over", you will get a good idea as to what is happening right now. Everyone is reporting this with the MSM falling over itself to cover it all as it falls apart. People all over blogsphere are asking; WTF, was it all a big LIE ???!!

AIDS SCIENCE:
THE AIDS VIRUS IS THE FIRST VIRUS IN HISTORY THAT DISCRIMINATES ACCORDING TO
RACE AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION!!

Silly me, and I thought only people did that...

AIDS IS OVER
_____________________

Latest
Liam Scheff @ GNN

There Will Be No Heterosexual AIDS Epidemic, Experts Admit

The World Health Organization confesses that 25 years of international Aids projections and programs were based on fear, not evidence. But they still want you to believe them.

It is official: Aids is not explicable by sexual transmission. There is no heterosexual Aids pandemic, and further, there will be no heterosexual Aids pandemic.

Read the rest here

*******************************