Those who can make you believe absurdities, will make you commit atrocitie —Voltaire

Thursday, April 05, 2007

HIV & AIDS Dissenting Views and Facts.

Enlace a la informacion en Espanol



AID$ Inc. - Gary Null


AIDS = AUTHORIZED - INSANE - DIS-INFORMATION - SYNDORME

HIV- antibody positive plus one of 27 old diseases (histoplasmosis, tuberculosis, lymphoma,cervical cancer etc...) is the new disease AIDS. But the same disease without HIV is simply the old condition.

Rethinking AIDS

HIV ISOLATION HAS NEVER BEEN PROVED.
THIS IS WHAT THEY CALL HIV ISOLATION. THIS IS NOT ISOLATION.



WHAT DOES AN HIV TEST DETECT?
Read the note on the kit box itself.


Lee Evans On The HIV Test


Rebuttal to "The Evidence That HIV Causes AIDS"

Fear Factor
Why so much fear to even bring up the subject even 25 years on?
Maybe these next clip give one a clue as to why.

Part 1
(2 minutes)


Part 2 (2 minutes)
OSA - Free To Question

Add to My Profile | More Videos
More written examples of sheer arrogance and insolence of the AIDS establishmente when challenged in the press. Read for yourself ans see how this debate is taking place on a the higher plains.
In The Press

The full list of Scientists who oppose or question the official hypothesis that HIV is the cause of AIDS.

Why is there a blackout on this information?
Something is very wrong here…

The biggest problem with AIDS censorship is this: defending the status quo has risen to an almost religious intensity ... and "religion" is often intolerant of questioning. People speak of AIDS doctrine, AIDS belief systems, AIDS heresy. Even some gay health activists fling the word "heretic" with all the fervor of medieval inquisitors lighting faggots under the feet of witches.
Patricia Nell Warren-Author of The Front Runner.


Full Length Videos:
HIV-Fact Or Fraud
The Other Side Of Aids
AIDS Inc-Gary Null
Deconstructing The AIDS Myth

"Now anyone who questions HIV and AIDS as a sexually transmitted threat to the entire world, is dangerous and politically incorrect. I have seen it so many times even among my friends. When these questions are raised, there is almost a programmed psychological reaction that shuts off all information intake and analysis. This reflex reaction disables all analytical thinking, and leaves the listener uncomfortable and despondent. Like a an icy talon twisting it’s way into the inner mind, the AIDS establishment’s 20-year fear and terror campaign has embedded itself deep into the American psyche."
Stephen Allen
Producer / HIV=AIDS: Fact or Fraud?


Of course the moment the AIDS industry admit they are wrong their huge funding will disappear. We have been sold out on all fronts, and this issue will not go away. Sooner or later the AIDS establishment will have to admit that the link between HIV and AIDS has NEVER been proven and that the a pure HIV virus has never even been isloated. No matter how long it takes THE TRUTH MUST OUT.

Sign petition here.



Dr. Peter Duesberg


In order to develop a hypothesis that explains AIDS we have considered ten relevant facts that American and European AIDS patients have, and do not have, in common:
(1) AIDS is not contagious. For example, not even one health care worker has contracted AIDS from over 800,000 AIDS patients in America and Europe.
(2) AIDS is highly non-random with regard to sex (86% male); sexual persuasion (over 60% homosexual); and age (85% are 25-49 years old).
(3) From its beginning in 1980, the AIDS epidemic progressed non-exponentially, just like lifestyle diseases.
(4) The epidemic is fragmented into distinct subepidemics with exclusive AIDS-defining diseases. For example, only homosexual males have Kaposi's sarcoma.
(5) Patients do not have any one of 30 AIDS-defining diseases, nor even immunodeficiency, in common. For example, Kaposi's sarcoma, dementia, and weight loss may occur without immunodeficiency. Thus, there is no AIDS-specific disease.
(6) AIDS patients have antibody against HIV in common only by definition-not by natural coincidence. AIDS-defining diseases of HIV-free patients are called by their old names.
(7) Recreational drug use is a common denominator for over 95% of all American and European AIDS patients, including male homosexuals.
(8) Lifetime prescriptions of inevitably toxic anti-HIV drugs, such as the DNA chain-terminator AZT, are another common denominator of AIDS patients.
(9) HIV proves to be an ideal surrogate marker for recreational and anti-HIV drug use. Since the virus is very rare (<>95%. Chemically distinct drugs cause distinct AIDS-defining diseases; for example, nitrite inhalants cause Kaposi's sarcoma, cocaine causes weight loss, and AZT causes immunodeficiency, lymphoma, muscle atrophy, and dementia. The drug hypothesis predicts that AIDS:
(1) Is non-contagious;
(2) Is non-random, because 85% of AIDS causing drugs are used by males, particularly sexually active homosexuals between 25 and 49 years of age, and
(3) Would follow the drug epidemics chronologically.



Dr. Kary Mullis, PhD, Biochemist, Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for inventing the polymerase chain reaction, the basis for the HIV viral load tests.
This is what he has to say about the the HIV=AIDS hypthesis:


“It’s not even probable, let alone scientifically proven, that HIV causes AIDS. If there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least with a high probability. There are no such documents.”

“The HIV-causes-AIDS theory is one hell of a mistake.”

“Years from now, people will find our acceptance of the HIV theory of AIDS as silly as we find those who excommunicated Galileo.”

“Where is the research that says HIV is the cause of AIDS? There are 10,000 people in the world now who specialize in HIV. None has any interest in the possibility HIV doesn’t cause AIDS because if it doesn’t, their expertise is useless.”

“People keep asking me, ‘You mean you don’t believe that HIV causes AIDS?’ And I say, ‘Whether I believe it or not is irrelevant! I have no scientific evidence for it.’ I might believe in God, and He could have told me in a dream that HIV causes AIDS. But I wouldn’t stand up in front of scientists and say, ‘I believe HIV causes AIDS because God told me.’ I’d say, ‘I have papers here in hand and experiments that have been done that can be demonstrated to others.’ It’s not what somebody believes, it’s experimental proof that counts. And those guys don’t have that.”

“If you think a virus is the cause of AIDS, do a control without it. To do a control is the first thing you teach undergraduates. But it hasn’t been done. The epidemiology of AIDS is a pile of anecdotal stories selected to the virus-AIDS hypothesis. People don’t bother to check the details of popular dogma or consensus views.”

“[Aids] is not ‘God’s wrath’ or any other absurdity. A segment of our society was experimenting with their lifestyle, and it didn’t work. They got sick. Another segment of our pluralistic society, call them doctor/scientist refugees from the failed War on Cancer, or just call them professional jackals, discovered that it did work. It worked for them. They are still making payments on their new BMWs out of your pocket.”

Dancing Naked in the Mind Field. Vintage Books. 2000


Dr. David Rasnick, PhD, Biochemist, Protease Inhibitor Developer, University of California.
“The HIV hypothesis of AIDS is the biggest scientific, medical blunder of the 20th Century. The evidence is overwhelming that AIDS is not contagious, sexually transmitted, or caused by HIV. The physicians who know or suspect the truth are embarrassed or afraid to admit that the HIV tests are absurd and should be outlawed, and that the anti-HIV drugs are injuring and killing people.”

“As a scientist who has studied AIDS for 16 years, I have determined that AIDS has little to do with science and is not even primarily a medical issue. AIDS is a sociological phenomenon held together by fear, creating a kind of medical McCarthyism that has transgressed and collapsed all the rules of science, and has imposed a brew of belief and pseudoscience on a vulnerable public.”

“Fifty percent of Africans have no sewage systems. Their drinking water mixes with animal and human waste. They have constant TB and malaria infections, the symptoms of which are diarrhea and weight loss, the very same criteria UNAIDS and the World Health Organization use to diagnose AIDS in Africa. These people need clean drinking water and treated mosquito nets [mosquitoes carry malaria], not condoms and lectures and deadly pharmaceuticals forced on pregnant mothers.”

“We’ve put 20 years and $118 billion into HIV. We’ve got no cure, no vaccine and no progress. Instead we have thousands of people made sick and even killed by toxic AIDS drugs. But we can’t just treat them for the diseases we know they have because if we do, we’re called ‘AIDS denialists.’ AIDS is a multi-billion dollar industry. There are 100,000 professional AIDS researchers in this country. It’s as hard to challenge as big tobacco at this point.”

“Those damn [HIV] tests should be outlawed. They’re lethal. First of all, it’s a death sentence in South Africa. People commit suicide, they’ve been stoned to death, they’ve had their houses burned down, they’ve been murdered. Just for having antibodies to HIV. They have been ostracized. And in certain rural communities, ostracism is equivalent to death. So you’re scared to death, first of all. And then you start taking the anti-HIV drugs, which cause AIDS, and if you take them long enough they will kill you.”

“In 1990 at the San Francisco AIDS conference, [HIV co-discoverer Luc] Montagnier announced that HIV did not, after all, kill T-cells and could not be the cause of AIDS. Within hours of making this announcement, he was attacked by the very industry he’d helped to create.”

“The National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, the Medical Research Council, and the World Health Organization are terrorizing hundreds of millions of people around the world by their reckless and absurd policy of equating sex with death. Linking sex to death has put these organizations in an impossible situation. It would be intolerably embarrassing for them to admit at this late date that they are wrong, that AIDS is not sexually transmitted. Such an admission could very well destroy these organizations or at the very least put their future credibility in jeopardy. Self preservation compels these institutions to not only maintain but to actually compound their errors, which adds to the fear, suffering, and misery of the world — the antithesis of their reason for being.”

British Medical Journal Rapid Response, 18 April 2003


More Quotes Link




COMMENTS:

To leave comments if you are not a member just choose the ANONYMOUS option and sign a name or a nick at the end of the written message.

Para dejar mensajes si no eres miembro puedes elegir la opcion ANONYMOUS y identificarte con tu nombre o nick al final del mensajes que dejes.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hola,

He puesto tu blog en el foro de univisión donde participo regularmente, como te he dicho en este foro hay varios luchadores unos más que otros que han emprendido su propia lucha con el gobierno, medicos, farmacias y demás.

La verdad nosotros no contamos con mucha gente que sepa inglés y mucho menos que sepan inglés y que nos quieran ayudar más que nada porque ay mucha más información en inglés que en español, te dejo unos links para que los revises y si quieres hacer parte del foro bienvenido sino hableremos por este blog.

Otro motivo por el cual quería hablar contigo es que hace un tiempo alguien del foro no "disidente" nos puso varios links de un actor porno que contagió a varias mujeres y ellas a su vez a otros y nos decían que si el VIH no existe entonces como fue que pasó eso? quería saber si tu sabías algo al respecto.

Esto porque mi hermana supuestamente se infectó por su marido pero nosotras estamos buscando la posible causa de su intoxicación que es lo primero que hay que hacer según Roberto Giraldo, te agradecería si pudieran darme o si tienes más información.

http://www.vivoysano.org.mx/
http://free-news.org/aembid06.htm
http://www.axel.org.ar/articulos/sida.htm
http://www.defiendetusalud.com/5968/index.html
http://www.wikilearning.com/en_busca_del_virus_perdido-wkccp-7903-12.htm
http://www.tig.org.za/pdf-files/icc_demanda_criminal.pdf
http://www.theperthgroup.com/
http://www.tig.org.za/
http://www.plural-21.org/sida.html
http://garlan.org/Cases/Parenzee/Gallo.html
http://www.newaidsreview.org/archives/archive_2007_02.shtml
http://barnesworld.blogs.com/

Salu2

Chispadevida

Manu said...

Primero quiero dejar claro que no puedo ni quiero responder preguntas de naturaleza medica. Cuestiones medicas son para un medico y no para mi.

Lo que si puede hacer es dirigirte a quizas comprender algunos argumentos basicos referente a esta cuention, asi luego podrias asediar a tu medico para que te contesta tus preguntas.

Primero- la prueba del VIH es una cosa absurda. Nadie tiene claro exactamente lo que pretende medir. Lo que si te puede decir es que la etiqueta del kit de la prueba advierte que no se puede detectar el virus del VIH con esa prueba. Eso esta en la caja del kit de prueba misma!

Lurgo presumiendo que hace lo que dice y detecta anticuerpos. Poruqe la deteccion de anticuerpos, que hasta aparecer el VIH era signo de imunidad contra un virus, por que con el VIH es signo de preocupacion? El argumento de base es ya algo sumamente absurdo si acceptas que ser imune es tener anticuerpos.

Insisto que las pruebas de VIH son ridiculas y peligrosas y nadie debe hacerla hasta que clarifiquen de manera seria QUE ES LO QUE DETECTA EXACTAMENTE Y SCIENTIFICAMENTE. Y aqui no estoy hablando del discurso oficial de la educadora sexual del colegio o demas organizaciones que viven del virus y el delirio que provoca.

Luego cuando Roberto Giraldo habla de intoxicacion hay que comprender que eso puede ser toda clase de cosas. Desde tener gripe o un herpes o cualquir tipo de infeccion,embarazo, haber tomado drogas, demasiado alcohol, y desdeluego el factor toxico del estres etc etc todo esto se puede considerar como intoxicacion. Asi que cuidado con eso por que no solo significa envenenarte con comida.

Yo por ejemplo se que antes de mi diagnostico hace 15 anos tenia una gripe fuerte de casi 3 semanas tratada con antibioticos. Me hicieron un prueba y me dieron un diagnostico positivo. Sabiendo ahora la informacion que en el momento no me proporcionaron, no hubiera hecho la prueba. Tambien podria haberme ido a hacerla de nuevo. Nunca hice eso. Ahora estoy rpeparando para hacerla de nuevo tras todos estos anos y lo hare de forma anonima.

Tambien enfatizo que hasta ahora no hay prueba ninguna que ese famoso virus esta o hace nada. la diferencia fundamental entre el grupo disidente es el grado de existencia y actividad del virus. Pero en ningun caso nadie acepta que es capaz de nada, menos aun tomar las riendas del sistema imunologico y provocar 30 enfermedades que han existido desde siempre y activarlas a la vez. Es absurdo y de risa. Salvo que estmos hablando de posesion por el demonio o algo asi.

Recomeindo que estudiais los estudios que muestran como es y lo que es la prueba del VIH para ver que es un autentico circo sin sentido.

Recomeindo que estudiais todo el material que explica porque el virus no puede hacer todas estas copsas y porque puede que nio existe. Yo desdeluego no creo que existe.

Por ultimo, trabaja con el miedo que tienes y la preocupacion que sientes, porque medicamentos apoarte, eso es lo que enferma mas que nada. No tengas miedo porque ya veras con tiempo que no hay nada.

Nadie puede contagiar a nadie porque no se puede contagiar a alguien con un virus que nadie encuentra ni en un muerto de SIDA.

Y no es responsabilidad mia que la gente utiliza o no condones. Conodones se deben utilizar para protegerte de las mil y una infecciones que puedes pillar, pero no tiene nada que ver el el VIH o el SIDA. A la vez comprendo que hay toda una industria que vive de la condomizacion y reciben dinero publico o entidades privadas con intereses directos para hacerlo. Pero sigue siendo un hecho que todavia no se ha presentado ningun estudio OFICIAL y sellado que muestra como llego a la conclusion oficial de la transmision sexual del supuesto e invisible virus. Cuando el Doctor Giraldo pedio la documentacion oficial referente a esa teoria en el parlamento Europeo, segun el le dujeron que no se habia hecho ningun estudio de eso porque no era necesario. Que todo el mundo ya sabia que se transmite asi!! Y asi vamos con todo el tema desde principio hasta ahora.

Por ultimo mira que es realmente lo que llamamos SIDA. La SIDA EXISTE en el sentido que las 30 y pico enfermedades que hacen este sindorme llamado SIDA son reales y matan a mucha gente. Pero eso no esta causado pro ningun virus o en este caso retrovirus.

Todo este informacion se puede encontrar hasta en Espanol. Yo voy poniendo mas cosas. Todo lo que encuentro. Admito que hay menos pero esto lo basico esta. Vete buscando e indagando en la pagina y seguro que encontraras todo lo que necesitas. No evitas trabajarlo, solo de esa manera puedes comprenderlo de forma profunda.

Esto es un circo que acabara cayendo por su propio peso.

Muchos de estos liks abajo las conozco. Algunas estan tambien en la entrada del blog.

Por ultimo disculpa mi Espanol. hago el mejor que puedo y espero que puedes comprender bien lo que digo.

Anonymous said...

AIDS is "caused by a lifestyle that was criminal twenty years ago."

Peter Duesberg, Village Voice, 2 February 1988, 25.

Shopping Blog said...

You simply link to one site and discount links of london that site in turn links to another site. charms bracelets That third site then links to you and completes a perfect web charms links of london that is untraceable by anything Google can do.This can build your links of london sweetie watches Serps immensely and give you a major edge over all your competition. links of london ring uk You would be surprised just how fast Google can move links of london silver necklace you up in rankings.Now is the time to stop wasting your time on useless link building that does nothing links of london silver earrings and start using a system that is prove to work..