I'm Free

Awesome Video



Visit Youtube to comment and rate.

April 23rd-Rethinking AIDS Day

Rethinking AIDS CLICK HERE and many other organizations made up of scientists, doctors, HIV-positive skeptics and simply ordinary concerned citizens want you to take action on this day. Write to a politician, talk to your doctor, read a critical book, hold a demonstration. Do something to make the world know that you recognize the fraud.

April 23rd is Rethinking AIDS Day (RAD)
A Call to Action
Rethinking AIDS, an international group of scientists, doctors, writers, health advocates, and others, has named April 23, 2008 the first Rethinking AIDS Day, a day for people all over the world to join with us and question the official dogma regarding HIV and AIDS, to learn the truth about the HIV tests and medications, and to act to re-establish honesty and integrity into our local community, regional, and national medical and health advocacy agencies and organizations, wherever we live.

It is time to Rethink AIDS
At an international press conference on April 23, 1984, Dr. Robert Gallo, a federally funded cancer researcher, announced that he had discovered "the probable cause of AIDS," a new virus which would later be given the name HIV. The world media accepted the discovery of HIV as the cause of AIDS as a matter of fact although no proof was presented that day or anytime thereafter. Now, twenty four years and $500 billion later, there is still no scientific evidence that Gallo ever isolated HIV from any of the AIDS patients he had studied, and there is still no published paper from any other scientist anywhere in the world demonstrating the direct purification of HIV from any human being.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Testing
To this day, there is no HIV test that actually looks for or finds HIV itself. All tests, such as the “HIV antibody blood test” patented by Dr. Gallo himself, detect the presence of substitutes or stand-ins for HIV, such as antibodies or genetic material thought to be associated with the virus. These non-specific tests can register positive due to the presence of antibodies produced in response to dozens of common illnesses, such as tuberculosis, herpes, colds, influenza, and liver disease, as well as those produced by vaccines for flu or tetanus, and even pregnancy. Furthermore, there is no universal standard for determining whether a test is positive or negative--the results of all "hiv tests" are interpreted based on criteria that vary depending on the test, the country, the health agency and the lab where you were tested.

Survey information you give also affects interpretation of tests. For example, if you identify yourself as a monogamous heterosexual caucasian, your same test may be interpreted differently from that of someone perceived as "high risk" such as a person of color, a former drug user, or a gay man. Medical articles about the tests make reference to "false positives" and "false negatives.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Fascism
Once the medical establishment decided that HIV caused AIDS and that the only treatment was toxic drugs, it became dangerous to your career if you were a writer or an academic or doctor or other medical or health professional who questioned the HIV AIDS paradigm. Prominent, even prize-winning researchers suddenly lost all funding for their research and found themselves ostracized or even terminated from their academic jobs. A group of self-appointed “true believers” in the paradigm have waged a worldwide campaign to publicly ridicule, threaten, silence, and marginalize anyone who publicly questions any aspects of the paradigm.


It is time to Rethink AIDS Definition
In industrialized countries, the definition of AIDS is circular: it is defined as a set of symptoms that can be the result of the mild or serious illnesses described above, or by the myriad side effects of the AIDS drugs, combined with a positive HIV test that may have, in fact, been triggered by one or more of those very illnesses.

If you are African, AIDS has a completely different definition that does not require an HIV test. Called the Bangui Definition, named after a WHO AIDS conference, the various symptoms of sometimes-deadly diseases and malnutrition that have plagued Africa for decades are now redefined as AIDS. Thus the many afflictions that are usually associated with substandard diets and non-existent sanitation or clean water and ordinary public health measures are now identified as a single, sexually-carried death-certificate disease. This label automatically stigmatizes, isolates, and marginalizes people, becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. The victims are then offered toxic drugs rather than medications and nutrition appropriate for their real illness.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Research
There has been no official progress for 24 years in producing a cure, vaccine, or safe effective treatment for AIDS, while many thousands of people have died, and while people who believe they are infected have lived in fear of having a death certificate disease, despite the vain attempts by a huge medical research establishment. Meanwhile, anecdotal evidence mounts that HIV positive people who pursue ordinary dietary supplementation and healthy lifestyles, and even some people with full-blown AIDS who pursue intensive, therapeutic supplementation regimens and intravenous vitamin C therapy, stay or become healthy and live normal lives. Although usually ignored by the medical establishment, researchers have created a name for them – Long Term Non-Progressors (LTNPs). AIDS researchers are not interested in finding out how many people there are like this.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Progression
The health status measurement of people who are “HIV positive” is a blood test which measures something these researchers call Viral Load. If you are “HIV negative,” and you have the flu, a high viral load is OK, because it is an indication that your immune system is working properly. If you are HIV positive, a high viral load is considered to be a sign of AIDS progression. If your AIDS medications are working “properly,” you will have an undetectable viral load, because your immunity has been completely suppressed.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Medicine
The primary development during these 24 years has been a series of toxic chemotherapy drugs (called nucleosides or DNA terminators), which destroy the immune system, and amino acid analogs (synthetic protease inhibitors), which cause gross tissue malformation and autoimmune disease. These extremely toxic substances are promoted as medications that will extend your life and keep you from getting sick, and keep your babies safe from mother-to-child transmission of AIDS. Yet their documented side effects are the very symptoms of AIDS progression.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Children
If you are a well-fed child with middle-class white parents, doctors don't really worry about you too much. However, if you are an African American orphan or child with incarcerated parents, it is assumed that you are HIV positive (even though you may not even have a developed immune system) so it is assumed that you need AIDS drugs. This was the excuse given for the unethical use of orphans for testing new AIDS drugs at the Incarnate Children’s Center in New York City.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Causation
We have been told for 24 years that AIDS is caused by a virus that can't be directly measured, cultured, or isolated. Despite billions of dollars in research, the HIV virus has still not been purified.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Stigma
Most people do not know the truth about the HIV test. If you are “HIV positive,” you are told that you have a communicable death-certificate disease. Legally, your body is a deadly weapon. You can be imprisoned for having intimate relations without telling your partner that you are “HIV Positive.” Your friends – if they stay your friends – may view you as a different person. You may lose your job and/or your health insurance. Whether you live in an industrialized country or a developing country in Africa or Asia, you are marginalized from society; you live in its shadows. Like the Pink Triangle that gay men were required to wear on their clothing in Nazi Germany, you wear a Pink Triangle on your psyche.

It is time to Rethink AIDS Propaganda
For years we have been told that more than 250,000 young adults in the US are HIV positive but are unaware of it. If this were true, we would see tens of thousands of people dying from the severe opportunistic infections that do often plague those who are taking AIDS drugs. Yet we see no such gruesome statistics.

For years we have been treated to the spectacle of World AIDS Day, in which governments and prominent celebrities tell us all about the “epidemic” of the death certificate disease, without telling us the truth.

April 23, 2008 is the first Rethinking AIDS Day. On this day and every day thereafter we ask that people all over the world begin questioning the HIV-AIDS paradigm – whether this diagnosis of a supposed death certificate disease, using faulty tests, for a virus that cannot be cultured, and then being prescribed expensive toxic drugs that destroy the immune system, makes any sense.

Here is a link to activities, new videos, and places – both virtual and real – where you can learn more about what you have not been told.
We encourage you to become an AIDS Rethinker, and join us in commemorating Rethinking AIDS Day!

Commemorate Rethinking AIDS Day - Act Now!

HIV Tests Questionnaire
by Liam Scheff

The Orders Of The Church Of AIDS

In the spirit of Erwin Chargaff and Umberto Eco.

Roberto P. Stock

Similarities between the Church of HIV-AIDS (CHA) and the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) are obvious. Recognized limitations of analogical thinking notwithstanding, our understanding of the current status quo of applied wisdom might be improved by indulging in some jocular pursuit of these facile analogies; the exercise may provide a framework for a better understanding of how some subsets of orthodox "scientists" of the CHA react to critical analysis.

We may, to begin, broadly classify the orthodox "scientists" into three types: Jesuits, Dominicans and Franciscans. We will examine each with the understanding that there are numerous shades and "in betweens", and some unusual exceptions to the generalities and generalizations put forth. These musings do not intend to constitute an exhaustive taxonomy of the Faithful.

The Jesuit Order is relatively young. It was born in the XVI century, a time when the RCC was under imminent threat of fragmentation (as it did fragment). St. Ignacio de Loyola, its founder, was responsible for providing the RCC with brain power to counter the infinitely attractive arguments – as well as the much higher moral ground – of the reformers. This brain power should operate subtly and profoundly but, very importantly, should never question the authority of the Pope and the necessity of only one truth for Salvation. As anyone trained in analytical thinking knows, this is a difficult task; one never knows where the pursuit of ideas will lead. The intellectual prowess of the Company of Jesus and their relentless drive to educate the princes during the Counter Reformation, made the Order the standard-bearer for the educational concerns of the RCC. It has been said that the Jesuits have given both the best and the worst of the legacy of the RCC to the world. Their legacy includes translation/preservation of many jewels of oral wisdom in conquered/annihilated peoples during the European expansion into the world, educational institutions that for a long time were of enviable quality, the Missions of the New World, and even important parts of that broad movement which has been called Theology of Liberation.

The true Jesuit of the CHA is educated. He/she can think rigorously and point out fallacies and inconsistencies in the heretic's argument. He/she has accomplished "something" regarded of value in the lab. He/she "knows his/her stuff". He/she can handle the paradoxes of HIV "variability" and invisibility, can defend the notion of "quasi-species", will remember the error rate of reverse transcriptase and will admit that failure to isolate is indeed a serious problem. He/she will craft the cleverest smoke-screens and dialectical obstacles. However, he/she will not question the fact that all this, added together, may actually mean that the dogma is wrong. Jesuits of CHA are not abundant. Maybe, in the beginning, David Baltimore was a Jesuit; Howard Temin certainly was. Current exponents of this subtler yet bounded mode of thought subscribe the idea that simplistic statements of the sort "HIV kills like a truck" (St. Gallo dixit) or "direct cytocidal effects" are false. But, as a true Jesuit, will continue to believe that HIV is doing "something important, even essential" anyway, and will proceed to spend as much (mostly tax-payer) money as they can studying all possible combinations of differentiation markers in the cells apparently injured, directly or otherwise, by "HIV disease progression". The Jesuit will not give up on dogma until ordered to do so from higher up, which would probably mean an irreversible upheaval of the CHA. As with the RCC with the various crowns of Europe, the CHA is bound to other power systems (such as the pharmaceutical industry and the HMOs) so tightly that it is very likely that the toppling of one will mean the demise of the others (at least in the present form). The Jesuit is faithful to a well established discipline of unified thought.

Dominicans of CHA are, however, a completely different kettle of piranhas. The Dominican Order of the RCC is much older than the Jesuits, and was founded when the Cathar heresy was widespread. It was chartered in the XIII century and St. Domingo de Guzmán, its founder, was a man of vision. His Order (also called the Order of the Preaching Brothers) was born to ensure that the RCC would have what is needed (and more) in this temporal realm to be able to carry out the spiritual guidance that a lost and sinful humanity needed. Dominicans knew that to be able to lead spiritually, the RCC needed earthly wealth; the superb monasteries they built are a testimony to how it was possible to extract everything that was needed from the impoverished flock they were shepherds to. Dominicans were, in some ways, the cause of the schism the Jesuits would combat three centuries later; they levied heavy taxes, and constituted themselves into, possibly, the most economically powerful force of the late middle ages. However, in their eagerness to secure enough economic power to be able to lead everyone to Paradise, they overstepped their bounds; they became too blatantly wealthy and even, to the horror of many faithful, began the issue that would become “the last drop”: the sale of indulgences.

Since the power of purification of a sacrament is directly emanated from the Divine Grace –no matter how lewd, obese and corrupt the priest who dispensed it– they sold this power in advance to those who could afford it. This proved to be too much, and Luther (in what he thunderously denounced as the usury of salvation) and others seized on this particularly debasing practice to carve up the following of the RCC. The rest is, as they say, history. The Dominicans were, needless to say, the most important force behind the Holy Inquisition and the most emblematic of all was the Grand Inquisitor Tomás de Torquemada, terror of the heretics, and a figure that looms threateningly to this very day.

The vrai Dominican of CHA is not necessarily well educated, although he/she may boast impeccable credentials from the best theological seminars. In fact, he/she is not unusually gifted for erudite debate. He/she does know his/her theology, but superficially and has a limited knack for dialectical thinking. They customarily prefer reading and writing reviews rather than doing the refined science that the massive budgets of their labs would allow. They would rather do the circuit of congresses and meetings than pursue “the mysteries of the virus”. They will exert an iron-fisted control on those committees that decide who and what ideas will be funded and, of course, they will patent and sell anything they can. The Dominicans of CHA will burn at the stake –academically speaking– anyone they consider to be a threat to the power the CHA wields, be it spiritual (which can be challenged by heretical teachings) or temporal (which can be threatened by curing the ill without their patented liturgy). Examples of the early – but still active -Dominicans of CHA are numerous: Fauci, Gallo, Blattner, et cetera; of more recent inception are Brother Wainberg, Friar Ho and, of course, the Small Inquisitor John P. Moore of Cornell Abbey. They do not need to elaborate arguments, they do not need to listen; they hand out salvation or torment because they know the truth, and they will be richly rewarded in power, money, or both. The Dominican is faithful to a well established power system.

This brings us to the Franciscans. In many ways, the Order of the followers of St. Francesco of Assisi are the most paradoxical members of the RCC. Their origins in the XIII century –almost simultaneously with the Dominicans– were so much at conflict with the temporal power of the RCC that they were often chastised. Their claim that the vow of poverty was more important than anything else inevitably made them clash with the more pragmatic Dominicans, who burned many of them as heretics for their desire to emulate the life of the Savior. The dispute was, largely, a conflict between the vows of poverty espoused by St. Francis and the vow of obedience, sine qua non for functionality within the RCC. Eventually, their obedience secured, they became a stable part of the RCC. Although they had a limited participation in the Inquisition, they produced mostly priests that would be “with the people”. In fact, Franciscans of the early days were often accused of sympathizing with, and even actively participating in, various radical/revolutionary movements which aimed at “curing” the RCC of its corruption, the most famous of which were probably the fraticelli, mercilessly pursued and exterminated by the early Inquisition.

The Franciscan of CHA is not rich. He/she may or may not be gifted for theological argument. He/she will, however, be of the people and will never patent anything. They will duly teach in small universities all that received wisdom they are told is the means to Salvation. If they are physicians, they will follow the “treatment guidelines” to the tee, and they will try to save as many as they can. They will rarely question, but they will dedicate their professional lives to what they consider is the well-being of others. We have all seen them, the Franciscans of CHA, walking the most miserable slums of Nairobi or Kinshasa, avoiding the open sewers, piles of garbage and the swarms of flies, bitterly denouncing sexual promiscuity. They are members of the Church after all, and their faith will almost always prevail over the data they may see around them. They will also sarcastically denounce the avarice of the Dominicans and their associates, that will not make life-saving antiretrovirals cheaply available to those poor and wretched sinners doomed to perdition, and the indifference of the well-funded Jesuits. They hand out antiretroviral death as Franciscan missionaries handed out original sin, shame and guilt; but they will not get rich for it, and will be often punished for their allegiance to the suffering. They are Franciscans after all, and they cannot be immune to suffering (as are Dominicans) or removed from it (as are most of the very few Jesuits); thus, occasionally, they will relinquish their vows of obedience to their need to aid the ailing, and will be punished for it. They are physicians who do not have international salaries, they are not heads of laboratories or medical units, and they often live with those they are trying to aid and console.

It is the Franciscans of the Church of HIV-AIDS that represent the majority of the still faithful, and who are not beyond actual salvation. Someone once said that “it is easier and more valuable to teach a brave man to think right than to teach courage to a clear-thinking coward”.

New Lows Old Prejudices

The Latest Piece Of Poor-Hating-Garbage-Evil-Fantasy To Come Out Of The AID$ Industry

Pre-Chewed Food Gave HIV to Kids
By MIKE STOBBE,
AP
Posted: 2008-02-07 09:54:50

ATLANTA (Feb. 6) - For the first time, health officials report that the AIDS virus can be spread by a mother pre-chewing her infant's food, a practice mainly seen in poor, developing countries.

Three such cases were reported in the United States from 1993-2004, government scientists said Wednesday in a presentation in Boston at a scientific conference.

It's blood, not saliva, that carried the virus because in at least two of the cases the infected mothers had bleeding gums or mouth sores, according to investigators at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

CDC officials say more study is needed. But they are asking parents and caregivers with HIV not to pre-chew infants' food, and are trying to educate doctors about this kind of transmission.

Read the rest here

"AIDS" = Eugenics
(with a new name)

It is with pieces like this that one could (if one really wanted to) see clearly how "AIDS" provides the basic structures for the powers that be to push forward with the Global Eugenics Program.

Now they are saying that:

Poor mothers feeding their starving children in Africa, or the poor, and always usually black, in developed countries in the west are spreading "AIDS". Mouth to mouth contact poor people have with their offspring, and by implication, with each other too, spreads disease.

I say:
Chilling!

It almost make one hark back and get nostalgic about "old style" Nazism, there we knew what we were dealing with. Now no one seems to get past the WHO's "new clever packaging". No one sees what is behind all this. No one sees that all this still obeys all those old prejudices and that intrinsic hatred we still have pf all those who are poor, or dark skinned.

Or maybe no one wants to see...

This is not a chapter from "Brave New World".
It IS "Brave New World".
It hath "such" people in it...

Are You Positive by Stephen Davis

Are You Positive
by Stephen Davis

Know Your HIV Tests

NEW BOOK NOW AVAILABLE from the author of WRONGFUL DEATH: The AIDS Trial Please click here to order
	Ripped from the headlines of today's news, Are You Positive? is a fictitious courtroom drama in the style of John Grisham. 26-year-old Tyree Johnson stands accused of first degree murder in a prominent South Carolina courtroom. But his murder weapon is not a gun or a knife; in fact, there was no violent crime at all. His "victim," Beth Ann Brooks, dated Tyree for a few months, and they made love more than once. However, Tyree Johnson had been diagnosed HIV-Positive, and the prosecution claims that Beth Ann Brooks was infected with HIV by Tyree and died some months later.
The defense, however, claims there is reasonable doubt that Tyree’s HIV diagnosis was wrong – that, according to numerous scientific studies, the so-called "HIV tests" are fraught with errors, and have been ever since their inventor, Dr. Robert Gallo, lied on his patent application. Furthermore, Tyree’s lawyer argues that there is no scientific evidence that HIV is transmitted by heterosexual intercourse, and that Tyree’s girlfriend died from taking lethal anti-retroviral drugs rather than from any HIV/AIDS-related illness. Based on more than 500 actual scientific studies and references, the author claims that every word of sworn testimony is true and verifiable. Are You Positive? raises serious questions about whether anyone has ever been properly diagnosed as HIV-Positive, and whether most AIDS victims are dying from the side-effects of the HIV medications prescribed by their doctors – all in a spell-binding novel. You be the judge. Please click here to order

Have a look, and don't miss the backing material that Davis makes available to critics and fans alike.

Have a look! Visit: http://www.areyoupositive.org/
Also check out here

AIDS Industry Looking For A Way Out-Part II

Anything Goes
Turn The Volume Up & Dance For Your Life

free player from mysplayer.com
Hot Mad News From
The AIDzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZone

The latest on how the AIDS industry seems to be looking for a way out of the mess, as some of the wiser rats start to jump the sinking ship to save their hinies and their tiny dangling dignities.

First this: AIDS Götterdämmerung Sc i

Now It Goes Totally Nuts

The Swiss BB-BB Theory/Diet
BareBack & BlackBox Pills
& free Toblerone for afters for those who don't smoke.

Read Here: AIDSMap

So Now AIDS IS NOT INFECTIOUS IF YOU TAKE PILLS PILLS PILLS THAT KEEP YOUR CDC COUNT VIRAL LOAD OF CRAP THINGIE UNDETECTABLE (WHATEVER ALL THAT MEANS OR HAS TO DO WITH ANYTHING).

SUMA:
CONFUSION GALORE AND A CRINGINGLY ALMOST PAINFULLY OBVIOUS DESPERATE TACTIC TO SELL PILLS!!! and the obvious: Always remember to use a condom before you hit the layers of slime that float between that initial HIV test and all the rest till you get laid in a grave dead form liver failure...

What a Colossal Mess
The tactic seems to be now to confuse everyone to the point that when you simply hear the word AIDS, you fall into a catatonic trance and start speaking in tongues. I start to get the sensation that they are starting to despair, and that many now would just love this whole thing to go away. Well fat chance of that lads and lasses. The mythological AIDS tsunami is now way too big for that....so hold on to your funding.

As big and powerful as the AIDS machine seems to be, it is becoming more evident by the day that it is now only something held up by peoples need to believe in it. Much like the supposed appearances of the Virgin Mary. Talking of AIDS in scientific terms finally is really starting to look like an exercise as nuts as that science fiction that supported the whole political scam.

HIV=AIDS+2x99%=Science Fiction+Nirvana=HAART-Dementia=
25 years of horse manure...

Doncha just love it?
Gotta laugh...otherwise you would have to get your Johnny Cash CD out and Cry Cry Cry.

Lucid & interesting take on it all
New AIDS Review

Now eat Toblerone...

What Happens to Your Body After Drinking a Coke?

Daily Poisons

Do you want to be healthy? Drinking soda (soft drinks bottled or canned) is bad for your health in so many ways; science can’t even state all the consequences. Here’s what happens in your body when you assault it with a Coke:

Within the first 10 minutes, 10 teaspoons of sugar hit your system. This is 100 percent of your recommended daily intake, and the only reason you don’t vomit as a result of the overwhelming sweetness is because phosphoric acid cuts the flavor.

Within 20 minutes, your blood sugar spikes, and your liver responds to the resulting insulin burst by turning massive amounts of sugar into fat.

Within 40 minutes, caffeine absorption is complete; your pupils dilate, your blood pressure rises, and your livers dumps more sugar into your bloodstream.

Around 45 minutes, your body increases dopamine production, which stimulates the pleasure centers of your brain – a physically identical response to that of heroin, by the way.

After 60 minutes, you’ll start to have a sugar crash.

Sources:

* Nutrition Research Center October 24, 2007


Remarks:
How many sodas have you had today? How about your kids? As of 2005, white bread was dethroned as the number one source of calories in the American diet, being replaced by soft drinks.

The average American drinks more than 60 gallons of soft drinks each year, but before you grab that next can of soda, consider this: one can of soda has about 10 teaspoons of sugar, 150 calories, 30 to 55 mg of caffeine, and is loaded with artificial food colors and sulphites. Not to mention the fact that it’s also your largest source of dangerous high-fructose modified corn syrup.

Let’s take a look at some of the other major components of a can of soda:

* Phosphoric Acid: Which can interfere with the body's ability to use calcium, leading to osteoporosis or softening of the teeth and bones. It also neutralizes the hydrochloric acid in your stomach, which can interfere with digestion, making it difficult to utilize nutrients.

* Sugar: It is a proven fact that sugar increases insulin levels, which can lead to high blood pressure, high cholesterol, heart disease, diabetes, weight gain, premature aging and many more negative side effects. Most sodas include over 100 percent of the RDA of sugar. Sugar is so bad for your health in so many ways, I even created an entire list outlining 100-Plus Ways in Which Sugar Can Damage Your Health

* Aspartame: This chemical is used as a sugar substitute in diet soda. There are over 92 different health side effects associated with aspartame consumption including brain tumors, birth defects, diabetes, emotional disorders and epilispsy/seizures.

* Caffeine: Caffeinated drinks cause jitters, insomnia, high blood pressure, irregular heartbeat, elevated blood cholesterol levels, vitamin and mineral depletion, breast lumps, birth defects, and perhaps some forms of cancer.

* Tap Water: I recommend that everyone avoid drinking tap water because it can carry any number of chemicals including chlorine, trihalomethanes, lead, cadmium, and various organic pollutants. Tap water is the main ingredient in bottled soft drinks.

Clearly, the over-consumption of sodas and sweet drinks is one of the leading causes fueling the world-wide obesity epidemic.

One independent, peer-reviewed study published in the British medical journal The Lancet demonstrated a strong link between soda consumption and childhood obesity. They found that 12-year-olds who drank soft drinks regularly were more likely to be overweight than those who didn't. In fact, for each additional daily serving of sugar-sweetened soft drink consumed during the nearly two-year study, the risk of obesity jumped by 60 percent.

Here’s another sobering fact if you’re struggling with weight issues: Just one extra can of soda per day can add as much as 15 pounds to your weight over the course of a single year!

Other statistics on the health dangers of soft drinks include:

* One soda per day increases your risk of diabetes by 85 percent

* Soda drinkers have higher cancer risk. While the federal limit for benzene in drinking water is 5 parts per billion (ppb), researchers have found benzene levels as high as 79 ppb in some soft drinks, and of the 100 brands tested, most had at least some detectable level of benzene present

* Soda has been shown to cause DNA damage – courtesy of sodium benzoate, a common preservative found in many soft drinks, which has the ability to switch off vital parts of your DNA. This could eventually lead to diseases such as cirrhosis of the liver and Parkinson's

If you are still drinking soda, stopping the habit is an easy way to improve your health. Pure water is a much better choice, or if you must drink a carbonated beverage, try sparkling mineral water with a squirt of lime or lemon juice.

There is absolutely NO REASON your kids should ever drink soda. None, nada, zip, zero. No excuses. The elimination of soft drinks is one of the most crucial factors to deal with many of the health problems you or your children suffer.

Experts Call for Shift in AIDS Policy

AIDS Götterdämmerung
The Twilight & Destruction Of The AIDS Gods

After the figures for AIDS in India and Africa fiasco, the Audry Serrano case, now comes this latest bit of great news. It looks like the AIDS industry is opting for a quite way out to avoid having to admit how very wrong they have all been. Just let the whole thing quietly crumble slowly, this seems to be the tactic here. You can also see from the poll that people are also taking this option, supporting the idea of re-directing AIDS funds to more pressing and real causes. I suppose this is the only way everyone can save face...

Experts Call for Shift in AIDS Policy
By MARIA CHENG, AP

Posted: 2008-01-18 17:18:23

Filed Under: Health News, World News

LONDON (Jan. 18) - In the two decades since AIDS began sweeping the globe, it has often been labeled as the biggest threat to international health.

But with revised numbers downsizing the pandemic — along with an admission that AIDS peaked in the late 1990s — some AIDS experts are now wondering if it might be wise to shift some of the billions of dollars of AIDS money to basic health problems like clean water, family planning or diarrhea.

"If we look at the data objectively, we are spending too much on AIDS," said Dr. Malcolm Potts, an AIDS expert at the University of California, Berkeley, who once worked with prostitutes on the front lines of the epidemic in Ghana.

Problems like malnutrition, pneumonia and malaria kill more children in Africa than AIDS.

Read the rest and take the poll here

Great Post By Dan

This is a great post by Dan on the new "Super Strain" of HIV that is now terrorizing the "Gay Community".

Surprise Surprise!!!

New Super-strain of HIV is Pink and Scottish
Notice how this new Super strain virus is even Pink!!! Remember that all photos of HIV are just photos of viral debris painted in bright colours, as HIV has never ever as yet been isolated. Also note how this particular photo seems to have the same shape as the map of Scotland including the Shetland Islands!!


Dan predicted just before Christmas in a post on his blog on December 12th titled Heads Up, that right after the New Year we would have something of the sort.

And lo and behold here it came....
New USA300 strain the New HIV
Scientific American

Here is Dan's blog entry on this new predictable super strain (pink) phenomenon designed to keep all gay men prisoners of fear and firmly within the belief that HIV is finally going to get them all, and daddy doctor is going to save you by giving you "life-saving" cocktails of chemo-love pills.

I'll Take Credit For My Prediction

The Fear Of Losing HIV

By Bob Findle
Artwork by Carter


What? Is that headline a typo? Shouldn’t it be "Fear of Getting HIV?" No. We do not need another article about the fear of getting HIV. We understand that fear. It has been skillfully and unrelentingly marketed to us by the HIV/AIDS industry until HIV=AIDS=DEATH is accepted without question, without proof, and obvious contradictions brushed aside without regard.

But what is this fear of losing HIV? Before I start, I should explain what losing HIV would be. The end of AIDS can only begin by losing HIV from the equation. All HIV treatments, cures and hysteria have to go. HIV is a dead end. False representations and promotion of HIV have to stop. The AIDS defining diseases must be unlinked and treated as the separate conditions they are. The solution for AIDS will happen when the real (not HIV) multi-factorial causes of immune suppression are allowed to be addressed. Losing HIV would mean seeing that we believe in HIV because that is all we have been taught to believe in, all we are presented with and allowed to see.

Being vocal about my HIV disbelief gives me an opportunity to observe the community’s response to anti-HIV information. Often the emotion is fear being displayed as anger, sarcasm, utter incomprehension, nervousness, etc. I questioned this, not understanding why information clearly showing that HIV is not causing AIDS and that AIDS is nothing more than a medical construct would be feared. Shouldn’t this be good news? Or at least information to be considered? I have come to realize that one of the reasons HIV is still with us as a valid theory, when it should have been dumped a long time ago, is that people fear questioning HIV, fear losing it, and fear even hearing a single word against it. I have come to see just how powerful the HIV mindset is. What does it mean if HIV is taken away? The obvious loss is that there would no longer be a viral theory to blame AIDS on. This causes fear in people because it brings out the question of lifestyle factors. For example, people do not want the very obvious link between drugs and AIDS to be promoted. People fear that if HIV is taken away, AIDS may be seen as being only a gay problem (which it is not) and there will be no more research, concern, or interest. The HIV/AIDS gurus fear their anti-virals, prescription drugs, or other HIV procedures being identified as immune suppressive, life destroying, and causing, not stopping AIDS conditions.

But the fear goes much deeper. Look at gay media. HIV/AIDS has become the major defining piece of our consciousness. Everything is HIV/AIDS industry advertisements, services and support, HIV/AIDS news, HIV/AIDS art, entertainment, fund-raisers and social events. This deluge can not be blamed totally on the media producers since they can only give their audience what that audience believes in. Is it any wonder why average Americans can not see gay men as a separate entity from HIV/AIDS? We surely can not even do it ourselves. HIV/AIDS, overtly or covertly, underscores everything. It pulls us together, gives us a focus, a cause, a commonality. The gay community has designed and lives in a total HIV-based culture, both individually and collectively. To have HIV challenged causes great anxiety since humans fear and resist any challenge to what is accepted as reality, even if that reality can be shown as false, which HIV=AIDS can be. This clinging to an HIV reality/identity goes deep. Psychologists have noted that they are seeing more and more gay men who are disturbed by their HIV negative status. These men feel left out and not quite complete. Is the equation actually GAY=HIV=GAY?

Losing HIV/AIDS would mean experiencing and working through a huge shift in consciousness. Do we stick with HIV because it is what we are comfortable with and it is easier than questioning it and looking at what lies beyond? I believe so. To lose HIV we have to accept some rather unpalatable realities. We have to see that we placed too much faith in the medical and scientific communities, trusting them to look out for us, ultimately to save us. I need to be clear that I am not trying to indict every person working within the HIV/AIDS structure as having ulterior motives. While we do have HIV/AIDS specialists and researchers who are truly incompetents, hiding their mediocrity and mistakes behind HIV, blaming it and not themselves for people’s sickness and death, we have many dedicated, competent people in this field who truly believe HIV is something to be combated and they are giving their all. My issue is with the policy makers at the CDC, the NIH, pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and huge HIV/AIDS organizations who produce the directives instructing the front-line workers what to believe about AIDS and what to do. We have to acknowledge that their goals and focus are not always in our best interest and there are often severe conflicts of interest stemming from greed and egos. We have to deal with the knowledge that HIV has never been a mistake. An honest mistake we could understand for humans make mistakes. But to lose HIV we must comprehend that we were methodically and purposely deceived and lied to from the very beginning and every attempt to challenge the deception was systematically squelched by the people doing the deceiving. This is not an easy realization. Nobody wants to believe that we could have been so duped, so abused. Just as the abused child, even when presented with the painful truth of their abuse, continues to refuse to believe it was Daddy who hurt them, the gay community must continue to believe in HIV and trust that the HIV/AIDS industry would never be guilty of harming us. For to believe otherwise means the next logical conclusion must be arrived at. And there is the fear. What have we, by our complacency and unquestioning faith, allowed to happen? The tremendous pain and suffering we as a community have dealt with all these years can never be measured. People making radical choices and major changes in their lives due to HIV. Millions upon millions of dollars bled from us, mainly in support of HIV. Horrific drugs and life destroying treatments to battle HIV. The ones we loved and cherished dead, we are told from HIV, when it was actually the treatments. Truly immune compromised people dead because the real cause of their conditions not addressed. To see HIV as the mistake it is, to lose HIV, we must see and somehow manage to accept that all this misery was largely avoidable and unnecessary.

The HIV/AIDS industry has their own valid fear of losing HIV. They know that once the HIV debacle is finally exposed, in addition to the loss of their ill-gotten fame and fortune, they will have to face the tidal wave of anger and rage from the people whose lives have been destroyed. They know they have to keep HIV going at any cost. And they succeed since they control the research, the protocols, the funding.

They have the money and positions to promote whatever they want regardless of truth. they succeed because we give them total control to do so. But they are starting to lose this control. More scientists and doctors are overcoming their own personal fears of being criticized for daring to speak against HIV. The media is slowly letting us see the dissentient movement. More groups are forming to combat the HIV misinformation machines.

I can understand why there is a fear of losing HIV. The aftermath will not be easy on any level for anyone. But we must not let this fear stop us from really looking at what is happening. HIV=AIDS will never be proven and the real evidence shows it should be rejected. The hunt for an HIV cure is a gold mine for the HIV/AIDS industry but a waste of our time, money and lives. To let HIV=AIDS stand without challenge we collectively agree to condemn hundreds of thousands, if not millions, to death. We have to confront our fears, acknowledge the slaughter of the HIV years, and move forward to stop any more HIV genocide. WE have to march on Washington, protest, demand change, free ourselves from HIV, not ask for more of the same. Open your minds people, risk facing your fears, let HIV go, see that the answers to AIDS are already here.