tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post9211879179903037882..comments2023-11-05T13:23:17.880+01:00Comments on This&That: AIDS: A Death CultManuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03735551145549081599noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-19855340121849908542011-12-23T05:11:22.486+01:002011-12-23T05:11:22.486+01:00Very interesting points in your blog it sure clear...Very interesting points in your blog it sure cleared many questions that I may have had. I loved it because I did learn a lot from it because of it.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.expresspharmarx.com/purchase/generic-levitra.aspx" rel="nofollow">Generic Levitra</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-21974609365746126002010-12-15T03:36:12.464+01:002010-12-15T03:36:12.464+01:00AIDS is the worst plague in modern history.Many sc...AIDS is the worst plague in modern history.Many scientists think that AIDS is in essence a social problem, since it is closely linked with such a social evils as <br />prostitution and drug taking.People suffering from AIDS live a miserable life.But there is still no AIDS vaccine and no cure.AIDS victims are most in need of the attention, care and help from other members of the society.Tiffany Jewelryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16740630857184470216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-63667030375933349812007-09-05T18:18:00.000+02:002007-09-05T18:18:00.000+02:00I totally agree. i just am not going to get into t...I totally agree. i just am not going to get into this kind of banter with those that need so much information to see that it's a joke. Just looking at the test disclaimers should be more than enough. The rest after goes straight into the "I NEED AIDS" zone.<BR/><BR/>I don't go there especially for people who resent having to say that they actually have a name.<BR/><BR/>I am just not interested. It's time to move on from this tiresome arena of pointless questions.Manuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03735551145549081599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-48588226648407559272007-09-05T16:45:00.000+02:002007-09-05T16:45:00.000+02:00Manu,regarding "David" and his ilk...when somebody...Manu,<BR/><BR/>regarding "David" and his ilk...<BR/><BR/>when somebody comes to a dissident blog/forum and claims to be "making up their mind", they might as well have "AIDS propagandist" tattooed across their forehead.<BR/><BR/>I'm of the mind these days that if somebody <I>expects</I> the dissidents to hold their hand as they try to figure things out... well, I'm not interested.<BR/><BR/>If they want to believe in the HIV/AIDS fantasy, complete with its inherent racism, homophobia and the contrived series of steps that can lead a healthy person to choke down body-deforming, liver-destroying drugs, fine. That's their choice. You've got to realize that if they're willing to believe in this fantasy, they've got a whole host of issues that they're unwilling to examine.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-91015374922483922302007-09-05T12:33:00.000+02:002007-09-05T12:33:00.000+02:00Thanks Dan. That's exactely my feeling on David. W...Thanks Dan. <BR/>That's exactely my feeling on David. What a load of tosh!! LOL<BR/><BR/>David I don't care what you decide to believe. You have to live with that not me. What you decide and how is not my responsibility but yours.<BR/><BR/>If your posts were not such a glaring example of what dan termed: trolling, I would have deleted them. I will leave them as they are so entertainingly contradictory, false and badly argued, it's a good little personal metaphore of all the AIDS lie and those who still support it stand for.Manuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03735551145549081599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-15420270624863396152007-09-04T05:50:00.000+02:002007-09-04T05:50:00.000+02:00David said: I don't really want to debate AIDS th...David said: I don't really want to debate AIDS theory or the value of the CD4 test here<BR/><BR/><I>Then</I> David said: I would, however, be interested in a response to my original question precisely because I haven't found anything where the CD4 tests have been "publicly admitted by public health officials" to be worthless.<BR/><BR/><BR/>David, your first statement contradicts the second statement.<BR/><BR/>David also said: Actually, I came here as person still making up his mind about the situation, and was hoping that this blog might help me clarify it.<BR/><BR/>You smell disingenuous to me, David. Actually, you reek. Just another AIDS propagandist troll pretending to be "making up his mind".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-54900842674697966342007-09-03T15:09:00.000+02:002007-09-03T15:09:00.000+02:00Actually, I came here as person still making up hi...Actually, I came here as person still making up his mind about the situation, and was hoping that this blog might help me clarify it. I don't really want to debate AIDS theory or the value of the CD4 test here; I would, however, be interested in a response to my original question precisely because I haven't found anything where the CD4 tests have been "publicly admitted by public health officials" to be worthless. If that were actually true, it would help me to come to a conclusion more sympathetic to your own; from what I can see, though, it was an exaggeration on Lauritsen's part. <BR/><BR/>It strikes me as ironic that one of the complaints that I see consistently in dissident literature is that the AIDS establishment doesn't respond to their questions and that's precisely the situation here. Obviously, this is your forum and you can write what you please, but from the tone of the blog and of this exchange, it seems to me that rather than exposing the AIDS lie, you're just preaching to the converted. <BR/><BR/>As far as my name, what does it matter? It's David, though, if that makes me less of a ghost.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-23164319023823610562007-08-31T12:53:00.000+02:002007-08-31T12:53:00.000+02:00I don't have to question anything I am not interes...I don't have to question anything I am not interested in questioning and that I am completely satisfied with on the strength of my personal experiences and observations and not because some bureaucrat has decided for me. John’s article is up on my blog because I agree with the broad message it send out. I don’t care about the technicalities of CD$ counts and viral loads and such nonsense.<BR/><BR/>What I do question however, is your total lack of understanding of my position here; that this whole AIDS circus means nothing. It's a fabrication. A fraud. It's on those grounds that I, at least, say that all related Church of HIV rituals are worthless, as they are an extension of a diagnosis based on a test that detects "nothing"; a worthless fraudulent test. I suppose you also question the fact that they are worthless too.<BR/><BR/>It's not my job to supply you with documents. If you want them you look for them. Did I ask you or anyone else for documents to look into this issue? No. I looked and found everything I needed to come to my conclusion myself. If you think I am going to be your personal document provider think again. If you want to believe that CD4 counts are an indication of anything, be my guest. Take a few HIV tests too. What do I care? I put the information I see fit out there and it’s up to you to look into it and find what you need to make a decision. This is a personal blog, not an encyclopaedia of official documents.<BR/><BR/>What makes you think I care, respect or believe anything just because it comes in official document form? I don’t. I encourage other people to do the same; we have all been lied to far too much for “officialdom” to have any credibility. If you need that information to convince you then you look for it. If you want me to help you because you are too dumb to find it yourself, then write to me in a less challenging and holy tone and I will consider doing so, though by your message I deduce this is nothing more than trying to get me engaged in scientific debate regarding the AIDS fraud, which, of course, I will always refuse to do. <BR/><BR/>Lies do not need scientific debate. They just need to be called lies.<BR/><BR/>Also I you want me to engage in any sort of debate or discussion taking my position into account, you should state who you are. Though I don't care much for this kind of public document worship some call debate, I like it even less when I find myself talking to faceless and nameless ghosts.Manuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03735551145549081599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-16047277084379554882007-08-29T10:28:00.000+02:002007-08-29T10:28:00.000+02:00Good technique for evading the question! Those lin...Good technique for evading the question! Those links all reference the Concorde Trial, all very interesting but not really what I was asking about, which was an admission by a public health official (which to me means some sort of government representative rather than a random MD) that the CD4 test is worthless. <BR/><BR/>I understand and applaud your questioning of the official dogma, but I think it's also important to question one's own, no? If Lauritsen (and, by extension, you) are claiming that something has been publicly admitted then you should be able to back up that claim. Otherwise it becomes a vicious cycle of claims and counterclaims (He said, she said, etc) and that's not very useful to anyone. <BR/><BR/>And no, I'm not looking for a YouTube link; a reference to which public health official(s) and when and in what context they made the statement would be fine. Without such, I'll conclude that it's wishful thinking on Lauritsen's part.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-84824601932906314322007-08-25T23:58:00.000+02:002007-08-25T23:58:00.000+02:00What do you want to see? The youtube clip with the...What do you want to see? The youtube clip with them saying so on CNN? I don;t think they do that kind of thing. You can visit here, read all the material and draw your own conclusions.<BR/><BR/>http://www.google.com/search?q=Lancet+343%288902%29%3A871-81&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a<BR/>http://yarchive.net/med/concorde_study.html<BR/><BR/>I have personal experience that it is worthless. Everyone knows thay knocked that test on the head themselves when the Viral Load of crap test came into force. Since then we know that that test is worthless too.Manuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03735551145549081599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2830726522923860114.post-37591490825427853702007-08-25T19:20:00.000+02:002007-08-25T19:20:00.000+02:00According to this article, "t has been known since...According to this article, "t has been known since at least 1993 (when the results of the Concorde AZT study were published), and has been publicly admitted by public health officials, that the CD4 test is worthless."<BR/><BR/>I'd be curious to see a reference to those public health officials' admission of such. Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com